04167nam 2200721 450 991078662460332120230516181757.00-8047-9229-110.1515/9780804792295(CKB)3710000000199215(SSID)ssj0001267608(PQKBManifestationID)12525892(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001267608(PQKBWorkID)11264397(PQKB)10341033(MiAaPQ)EBC1742618(DE-B1597)564622(DE-B1597)9780804792295(Au-PeEL)EBL1742618(CaPaEBR)ebr10895703(OCoLC)923709169(OCoLC)1178769672(EXLCZ)99371000000019921520140731h20142014 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtccrExplanation and progress in security studiesbridging paradigm divides in international relationsStanford, CaliforniaStanford University Press2014©20141 online resource (324 pages)Stanford Security StudiesBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph0-8047-9095-7 0-8047-9226-7 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Contents --Preface --Introduction --1. Traditions of Explanation and the Idea of Scientific Progress --2. Explanation in the Natural and Social Sciences --3. The Nuclear Proliferation Debate --4. The Balance-of-Power Debate --5. The Democratic Peace Debate --6. Analysis, Alternatives, Conclusion --Notes --References --IndexExplanation and Progress in Security Studies asks why Security Studies, as a central area of International Relations, has not experienced scientific progress in the way natural sciences have—and answers by arguing that the underlying reason is that scholars in Security Studies have advanced a range of different notions of "explanation" or different criteria of "explanatory superiority" to show that their positions are better than rival positions. To demonstrate this, the author engages in in-depth content analysis of the generally recognized exemplars of explanation and explanatory superiority in three of the core debates in the disciplines: Why do states pursue policies of nuclear proliferation? Why do states choose to form the alliances they do? And why do liberal democratic states behave the way they do toward other liberal democracies? The book reveals that authors in the debates that have shown the most progress use similar criteria in arguing for and against the key explanations. In the nuclear proliferation debate, there is wide divergence in the criteria the most visible authors use, and there is wide divergence in the explanations offered. In the alliance formation/balance-of-power debate, there is some overlap of criteria the most important authors use, and there has been some limited movement toward consensus. In the democratic peace debate there has been much more overlap of criteria the most prominent authors use, and there is agreement on both some positive and negative conclusions.International relationsMethodologyFBCInternational relationsPhilosophyFBCSecurity, InternationalFBCInternationale relationerFBCInternational sikkerhedFBCExplanationInternational relationsMethodology.International relationsPhilosophy.Security, International.Internationale relationerInternational sikkerhedExplanation.327.101zChernoff Fred, authttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1533107Chernoff Fred1533107MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910786624603321Explanation and progress in security studies3779766UNINA03595nam 22005535 450 991033766940332120200704162354.03-030-21866-X10.1007/978-3-030-21866-9(CKB)4100000008701649(MiAaPQ)EBC5825098(DE-He213)978-3-030-21866-9(EXLCZ)99410000000870164920190711d2019 u| 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierMadness and Genetic Determinism Is Mental Illness in Our Genes? /by Patrick D. Hahn1st ed. 2019.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,2019.1 online resource (196 pages)3-030-21865-1 1. The Beginning -- 2. Ernst Rüdin and Family Studies -- 3. Franz Kallmann and Twin Studies -- 4. The Story of the Genain Sisters -- 5. Adoption Studies -- 6. The Mass-Marketing of Mental Illness -- 7. The Human Genome Project Era -- 8. The Story of January Schofield -- 9. Trauma and Psychosis -- 10. The Asylum Era and Moral Therapy -- 11. Frieda Fromm-Reichmann and Chestnut Lodge -- 12. Ronald Laing and Kingsley Hall -- 13. Soteria House and Open Dialogue Therapy -- 14. The Ghosts of Rüdin and Kallmann.This book explores the history of genetic determinist theories of mental illness, beginning in the nineteenth century and continuing right up to the present day. A century of research in the field of psychiatric genetics, from family studies to twin studies to adoption studies to genome-wide association studies, has produced no credible evidence of a strong genetic components to so-called “mental illnesses,” no findings that help the human condition in any way, and in fact has caused great harm by diverting attention away from the well-established causes of these conditions, which have their roots in trauma and other adverse childhood experiences. This book also explores the long tradition of humanistic psychiatry and its great success in treating these conditions with an empathetic, client centered approach—a tradition that has been all but forgotten in the modern era of biogenetic explanations and drug-centered treatments for mental illness. Patrick D Hahn is an Affiliate Professor of Biology at Loyola University Maryland, USA, and a freelance writer. .Behavior geneticsBiological psychologyPsychopharmacologyMedicine—HistoryBehavioral Geneticshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/Y47000Biological Psychologyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/Y20020Psychopharmacologyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H53010History of Medicinehttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/H64000Behavior genetics.Biological psychology.Psychopharmacology.Medicine—History.Behavioral Genetics.Biological Psychology.Psychopharmacology.History of Medicine.616.89042616.89042Hahn Patrick Dauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1050678BOOK9910337669403321Madness and Genetic Determinism2480671UNINA