01360nam a2200265 a 450099100366603970753620250306085407.0220620s2018 it 001 | ita 9788814227202b14368481-39ule_instBibl. Dip.le Aggr. Scienze Giuridiche - Sez. Studi Giuridiciita346.450922Barcellona, Eugenio280886La gestione collettiva del risparmio a seguito della direttiva GEFIA :investment companies, family offices, club deals, spac, holding companies /Eugenio BarcellonaMilano :Giuffrè,̈2018VIII, 119 p. ;24 cmQuaderni di Giurisprudenza Commerciale ;420Fondi comuni di investimento speculativiGestioneDirettive comunitarie [:] Unione europea . Direttiva n. 2011/61/UERecezioneItalia.b1436848107-12-2019-06-19991003666039707536LE027 346.45 BAR08.0112027000347698le027pE15.00-l-00000.i1589383219-06-19LE025 ECO 346 BAR07.0112025000286801le025Prof. ssa Luchena-E15.00-l-00000.i1594346x07-12-20Gestione collettiva del risparmio a seguito della direttiva GEFIA1505351UNISALENTOle027le025- -ma-itait3003541oam 22005294a 450 991031523240332120230621140735.01-947447-57-210.21983/P3.0202.1.00(CKB)4100000007823977(OAPEN)1004668(OCoLC)1076791151(MdBmJHUP)muse77040(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/36160(oapen)doab36160(EXLCZ)99410000000782397720180413d2018 uy 0engurmu#---auuuutxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierMythodologies: Methods in Medieval Studies, Chaucer, and Book HistoryJoseph A. Dane1st edition.Brooklyn, NYpunctum books2018Santa Barbara, CA :Punctum Books,2018.©2018.1 online resource (286 pages) illustrations; PDF, digital file(s)Print version: 9781947447561 Includes bibliographical references.Mythodologies challenges the implied methodology in contemporary studies in the humanities. We claim, at times, that we gather facts or what we will call evidence, and from that form hypotheses and conclusions. Of course, we recognize that the sum total of evidence for any argument is beyond comprehension; therefore, we construct, and we claim, preliminary hypotheses, perhaps to organize the chaos of evidence, or perhaps simply to find it; we might then see (we claim) whether that evidence challenges our tentative hypotheses. Ideally, we could work this way. Yet the history of scholarship and our own practices suggest we do nothing of the kind. Rather, we work the way we teach our composition students to write: choose or construct a thesis, then invent the evidence to support it. This book has three parts, examining such methods and pseudo-methods of invention in medieval studies, bibliography, and editing. Part One, “Noster Chaucer,” looks at examples in Chaucer studies, such as the notion that Chaucer wrote iambic pentameter, and the definition of a canon in Chaucer. “Our” Chaucer has, it seems, little to do with Chaucer himself, and in constructing this entity, Chaucerians are engaged largely in self-validation of their own tradition. Part Two, “Bibliography and Book History,” consists of three studies in the field of bibliography: the recent rise in studies of annotations; the implications of presumably neutral terminology in editing, a case-study in cataloguing. Part Three, “Cacophonies: A Bibliographical Rondo,” is a series of brief studies extending these critiques to other areas in the humanities. It seems not to matter what we talk about: meter, book history, the sex life of bonobos. In all of these discussions, we see the persistence of error, the intractability of uncritical assumptions, and the dominance of authority over evidence.Literary studies: classical, early & medievalbicsscElectronic books. medieval studiesChaucerbook historyintellectual historybibliographyLiterary studies: classical, early & medieval001.30721Dane Joseph A923102MdBmJHUPMdBmJHUPBOOK9910315232403321Mythodologies2159344UNINA