04322nam 22006135 450 991030061520332120240619233609.03-319-95381-810.1007/978-3-319-95381-6(CKB)4100000005323102(DE-He213)978-3-319-95381-6(MiAaPQ)EBC6312712(EXLCZ)99410000000532310220180727d2018 u| 0engurnn#008mamaatxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierArgumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective /by Frans H. van Eemeren1st ed. 2018.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2018.1 online resource (XI, 199 p. 10 illus.)Argumentation Library,1566-7650 ;333-319-95380-X Includes bibliographical references and index.Chapter 1. Argumentation theory as a discipline -- Chapter 2. Building a theory of argumentation -- Chapter 3. A model of a critical discussion -- Chapter 4. Critical discussion and the identification of fallacies -- Chapter 5. Descriptive studies of argumentative discourse -- Chapter 6. Analysis as resolution-oriented reconstruction -- Chapter 7. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse -- Chapter 8. Distinguishing between different kinds of argumentative practices -- Chapter 9. Prototypical argumentative patterns -- Chapter 10. Pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches to argumentation.The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang together. The following crucial topics are discussed: (1) argumentation theory as a discipline; (2) the meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics; (3) the model of a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion; (4) fallacies as violations of a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse; (5) descriptive research of argumentative reality; (6) analysis as theoretically-motivated reconstruction; (7) strategic manoeuvring aimed at combining achieving effectiveness with maintaining reasonableness; (8) the conventionalization of argumentative practices; (9) prototypical argumentative patterns; (10) pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective is clearly written and makes argumentation theory understandable to all scholars and advanced students interested in argumentation research.Argumentation Library,1566-7650 ;33Business ethicsPolitical sciencePhilosophySocial sciences—PhilosophyEthicsBusiness Ethicshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E14050Political Philosophyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E37000Social Philosophyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E43000Moral Philosophyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E41000Business ethics.Political sciencePhilosophy.Social sciences—Philosophy.Ethics.Business Ethics.Political Philosophy.Social Philosophy.Moral Philosophy.808Eemeren F. H. van(Frans Hendrik),1946-authttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut850183MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910300615203321Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective4167473UNINA