04484nam 22006015 450 991029843220332120230810193134.03-319-72992-610.1007/978-3-319-72992-3(CKB)4100000002485406(MiAaPQ)EBC5357919(DE-He213)978-3-319-72992-3(PPN)22463836X(EXLCZ)99410000000248540620180228d2018 u| 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierSemiotics of Animals in Culture Zoosemiotics 2.0 /edited by Gianfranco Marrone, Dario Mangano1st ed. 2018.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2018.1 online resource (222 pages)Biosemiotics,1875-466X ;173-319-72991-8 Introduction: Towards Zoosemiotica 2.0 -- Part1: Animal as Food, Food for Animals. Chapter1. When To Eat Meat? Towards A Diet Of Caring -- Chapter2. Anti-Speciesist Rhetoric -- Chapter3. Aesthetics of Nutrition, Ethics of Animality: the Packaging of Vegan and Vegetarian Products in the Italian Organised Distribution Market -- Chapter4. Forms of Animality: The Dog -- Chapter5.Pet Food Communication: Notes on the Crisis of Naturalism -- Chapter6. Cat Cafés and Dog Restaurants -- Chapter7. The Birth of a Pet? The Rabbit -- Part 2: Animals in the Texts, Texts as Animals. Chapter8. Bestiality: Animal Cultures -- Chapter9. On the Logic of Animal Umwelten: The Animal Subjective Present, or Zoosemiotics of Choice and Learning -- Chapter10 Of Men, Dogs and Bears. Communication in the Wilderness -- Chapter11. The Mixted Category Human-Animal in New Anthropology and in the Arts -- chapter12. The “Morally Abandoned Child” and the “Inner Savage” -- Chapter13. Frank and Johnny and Evie. Ontological shifts in a J.R. Ackerley novel -- Chapter14. The human-animal relationship and the musical metaphor in The Great Animal Orchestra by Bernie Krause. .To place animals within the realm of nature, means inserting them among the articulations of culture and the social. Semiotics has never avoided this chiasmus, choosing to deal from the outset with the problem of the languages of animals following the old admonition of Montaigne: it is not that animals do not talk, it is us who do not understand them. Recent research in the field of the anthropology of nature and sociology of sciences and techniques allow to think about the Zoosemiotic issue in a different way. Instead of transplanting the language structures – gestures, LIS, etc. – for a semiotic study of the forms of the human and social meaning, it seems more apt to look at their discourse, and as such, the actual interactions, communicative and scientific as well as practical and functional, between humans and non-humans. This book aims to investigate precisely this hypothesis, known here as Zoosemiotics 2.0, working on several fronts and levels: · Anthropology · Languages of the image and visual representations, from art history to cinema · Old and new media. From literature to comics, from cartoons to TV documentaries but also advertising, music, Web and social networks. All those cultural products that talk about the role of human and non-human in society implicitly proposing (and in some way imposing) a form of articulation of such a relationship. · Food and feeding rites · Animalist, vegetarian and vegan movements · Philosophy: metaphysics, ethics, aesthetics.Biosemiotics,1875-466X ;17PsychobiologyHuman behaviorSemioticsSciencePhilosophyBehavioral NeuroscienceSemioticsPhilosophy of SciencePsychobiology.Human behavior.Semiotics.SciencePhilosophy.Behavioral Neuroscience.Semiotics.Philosophy of Science.570.14Marrone Gianfrancoedthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtMangano Darioedthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edtMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910298432203321Semiotics of Animals in Culture2527132UNINA