03371 am 2200793 n 450 9910282249103321201805282-84292-797-42-84292-486-X10.4000/books.puv.2431(CKB)2560000000329706(PPN)241291674(FrMaCLE)OB-puv-2431(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/52054(PPN)192343319(EXLCZ)99256000000032970620180730j|||||||| ||| 0freuu||||||m||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierLupus in fabula Six façon d'affabuler La Fontaine /Marc EscolaSaint-Denis Presses universitaires de Vincennes20181 online resource (256 p.) In French2-84292-141-0 Soutenu par une discrète érudition, cet essai voudrait offrir une approche résolument ludique des Fables de La Fontaine : l’auteur n’y propose pas une nouvelle interprétation mais l’élaboration d’un mode de lecture, librement inspiré des jeux sérieux de l’Oulipo comme des théories sur la réécriture, qui suppose au sein d’une fable la production imaginaire de « fables possibles ». L’exercice est moins irrévérencieux qu’il n’y paraît : la loi même du genre veut qu’il y ait toujours dans une fable de quoi en faire une autre ; chaque fable étant elle-même le produit d’une réécriture, on voit mal qu’elle puisse interdire au lecteur de se livrer à son tour à un exercice de transformation. « Affabuler » les fables, c’est donc à la fois réfléchir sur les choix de La Fontaine entre plusieurs versions possibles de ses textes sources, et esquisser en retour quelques apologues nouveaux ; c’est aussi et surtout se rendre sensible à la « fabrique » même du dispositif fabulaire. En nous donnant à rêver, ou à écrire, les fables fantômes qui hantent les fables réelles, l’auteur découvre à nos yeux un La Fontaine finalement inédit – tout à la fois plus « gaillard » et plus politique que celui consacré par la tradition scolaire.Lupus in fabulaLupus in Fabula six Facons D'affabuler la FontaineLiterary Theory & Criticismaffabulationchairdix-septième sièclefablegibierhéronlouppoissonsingeécrituresingeécriturehéronchairaffabulationpoissonfabledix-septième siècleloupgibierLiterary Theory & Criticismaffabulationchairdix-septième sièclefablegibierhéronlouppoissonsingeécritureEscola Marc176068Escola Marc176068FR-FrMaCLEBOOK9910282249103321Lupus in fabula1686849UNINA04459oam 2200661zu 450 991022007770332120220901164538.00-8330-8334-1(CKB)3360000000476955(SSID)ssj0001179702(PQKBManifestationID)12404167(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001179702(PQKBWorkID)11182903(PQKB)10760426(oapen)doab115202(EXLCZ)99336000000047695520160829d2013 uy 0engurmn|---annantxtccrVirtual collaboration for a distributed enterprise /Amado Cordova [et al.]RAND Corporation2013Santa Monica, CA :Rand Corporation20131 online resource (xi, 29 pages)Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"RAND Project Air Force."0-8330-8003-2 The need for effective virtual collaboration -- The impact of different types of virtual collaboration on team dynamics and team -- Effectiveness -- Computer-mediated communications -- Use of legacy computer-mediated communications -- Impact of legacy computer-mediated communications on team effectiveness -- Audioconferencing -- Use of audioconferencing -- Impact of audioconferencing on team effectiveness -- Videoconferencing -- Use of videoconferencing -- Impact of videoconferencing on team effectiveness -- Evaluating the performance of virtual collaboration tools -- Conclusions and recommendations.The geographic diversity of many military enterprises, along with that of their partners and customers, has made virtual collaboration indispensable for conducting daily operations. Virtual collaboration tools can enable intrasite and intersite collaborative analyses, allow for sites to provide more effective surge capacity, and allow the regional expertise developed at each site to be applied wherever necessary across the enterprise. But communication between non-colocated (virtual) teams poses important challenges, including potential difficulty building cohesiveness and trust among team members and difficulty establishing a common understanding of information or situations. This report addresses these challenges through an assessment of three modes of virtual collaboration, computer-mediated communication, audioconferencing, and videoconferencing, and recommends several ways for intelligence enterprises to tackle them using virtual collaboration tools. These recommendations include: (1) determine which virtual collaboration tools and features are most beneficial using experimental research involving simulated tasks and constraints that closely mirror the military enterprise's operational environment; (2) standardize the lexicon and communications practices associated with virtual collaboration-chat, in particular-and train personnel in these practices; and (3) explore the use of videoconferencing in real-time communications between personnel, their partners, and their customers at different sites. In particular, we recommend that Air Force intelligence enterprises consider the use of personal or webcam-based videoconferencing between intelligence personnel located at different sites, as well as between these personnel and remotely piloted aircraft flight crews.Communications, MilitaryUnited StatesVirtual work teamsUnited StatesMilitary intelligenceUnited StatesTeleconferencingUnited StatesMilitary & Naval ScienceHILCCLaw, Politics & GovernmentHILCCArmiesHILCCUnited StatesAir ForceCommunication systemsCommunications, MilitaryVirtual work teamsMilitary intelligenceTeleconferencingMilitary & Naval ScienceLaw, Politics & GovernmentArmies355.6/8Cordova Amado1243658Keller Kirsten MMenthe LanceRhodes Carl1970-Project Air Force (U.S.).Rand Corporation.PQKBBOOK9910220077703321Virtual collaboration for a distributed enterprise2884595UNINA