02551nam 22004573a 450 991028087230332120250204000824.09788538603290(CKB)4100000005183340(OAPEN)1000301(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/34283(ScCtBLL)9856b94a-c9ac-4ae7-8b70-3e8c513d497b(OCoLC)1051778021(oapen)doab34283(NjHacI)994100000005183340(EXLCZ)99410000000518334020250204i20162020 uu poruuuuu---auuuutxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierCiência, medicina e perícia nas tecnologias de governoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2016[s.l.] :Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul,2016.1 online resource (175)9788538603290 8538603299 Anthropology has been playing a central role in questioning the supposed objective and apolitical character of scientific knowledge by underlining the socio-cultural context and history of the constitution of any scientific theory. From different research universes, anthropologists have sought to demonstrate how science and politics are composed, juxtaposed and produced in the daily work of social actors. In the wake of what Donna Haraway (1995) pointed out, it is there would not be the "science" look, but the look of the scientists - always located in a space (which is not only geographical, but temporal, cultural, marked by social differences, etc.). It is therefore based on the premise that science and are mutually constituted and from specific contexts. Following In this line, this collection explores how certain knowledges are constituted and legitimized, how technologies of government come into action - and, through practices of the social agents, are (re) formulated - and how through such devices new categories of analysis, social markers, populations and subjectivities (FONSECA, MACHADO, 2015)AnthropologyData processingAnthropologyHistoryAnthropologyData processing.AnthropologyHistory.301.0285Besen Lucas Riboli1850591ScCtBLLScCtBLLBOOK9910280872303321Ciência, medicina e perícia nas tecnologias de governo4443734UNINA