00995nam0-2200301 --450 991027866050332120180712092209.0463882UIT1907 212520180712d1907----km y0itay50 baitaITy 001yy<<Il >>trasporto ferroviario nella scienza e nella praticacon aggiunta: la legge sull'ordinamento definitivo dell'esercizio di StatoUmberto PipiaMilanoSocietà Editrice Libraria1907VIII, 568, XXXI p.24 cmFerrovieItaliaStoriaFerrovieItaliaLegislazione1907FerrovieOrdinamentoItaliaTrasporti ferroviariPipia,Umberto227924ITUNINAREICATUNIMARCBK9910278660503321G1/222709DINTRDINTRTrasporto ferroviario nella scienza e nella pratica1506208UNINA04127nam 22007692 450 991078613190332120151005020622.01-139-88777-71-107-06466-X1-107-05628-41-107-05737-X1-107-05416-81-107-05863-51-107-05516-41-139-01794-2(CKB)2670000000338674(EBL)1182918(SSID)ssj0000834722(PQKBManifestationID)11460261(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000834722(PQKBWorkID)10982230(PQKB)11280060(UkCbUP)CR9781139017947(MiAaPQ)EBC1182918(Au-PeEL)EBL1182918(CaPaEBR)ebr10695285(CaONFJC)MIL494683(OCoLC)833300205(EXLCZ)99267000000033867420110216d2013|||| uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierDisability and information technology a comparative study in media regulation /Eliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University[electronic resource]Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2013.1 online resource (xxiii, 288 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Cambridge disability law and policy seriesTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).1-107-50289-6 0-521-19161-0 Includes bibliographical references (p. 263-282) and index.1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights -- 2. Case study: Canada -- 3. Case study: the European Union -- 4. Case study: the United Kingdom -- 5. Case study: the United States of America -- 6. Lessons to be learnt? : Reflection on the case studies.Disability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. It focuses on the tension between social and economic values in the regulation of ICTs and calls for a regulatory approach based on a framework of principles that reflects citizenship values. The analysis identifies challenges encountered in the jurisdictions examined and points toward the rights-based approach advanced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as a benchmark in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities to have equal access to information. The research draws on a wealth of resources, including legislation, cases, interviews, consultation documents and responses from organisations representing persons with disabilities.Cambridge disability law and policy series.Disability & Information TechnologyPeople with disabilitiesInformation techologyCase studiesPeople with disabilitiesServices forData processingCase studiesComputers and people with disabilitiesCase studiesPeople with disabilitiesLegal status, laws, etcCase studiesMass mediaLaw and legislationCase studiesLibraries and people with disabilitiesCase studiesPeople with disabilitiesInformation techologyPeople with disabilitiesServices forData processingComputers and people with disabilitiesPeople with disabilitiesLegal status, laws, etc.Mass mediaLaw and legislationLibraries and people with disabilities004.087Varney Eliza1978-1537441UkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910786131903321Disability and information technology3786743UNINA