03950nam 22005415 450 991025533510332120200706102416.03-319-32020-310.1007/978-3-319-32020-5(CKB)3710000000627533(EBL)4461643(DE-He213)978-3-319-32020-5(MiAaPQ)EBC4461643(EXLCZ)99371000000062753320160330d2016 u| 0engur|n|---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierA Critical Overview of Biological Functions /by Justin Garson1st ed. 2016.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2016.1 online resource (119 p.)Philosophy of Science,2366-4495Description based upon print version of record.3-319-32018-1 Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters.Chapter 1. What is a theory of function supposed to do? -- Chapter 2. Goals and Functions -- Chapter 3. Function and Selection -- Chapter 4. Function and Fitness -- Chapter 5. Functions and Causal Roles -- Chapter 6. Alternative Accounts of Function -- Chapter 7. Conclusion: What Next?.This book is a critical survey of and guidebook to the literature on biological functions. It ties in with current debates and developments, and at the same time, it looks back on the state of discourse in naturalized teleology prior to the 1970s. It also presents three significant new proposals. First, it describes the generalized selected effects theory, which is one version of the selected effects theory, maintaining that the function of a trait consists in the activity that led to its differential persistence or reproduction in a population, and not merely its differential reproduction. Secondly, it advances “within-discipline pluralism” (as opposed to between-discipline pluralism) a new form of function pluralism, which emphasizes the coexistence of function concepts within diverse biological sub-disciplines. Lastly, it provides a critical assessment of recent alternatives to the selected effects theory of function, namely, the weak etiological theory and the systems-theoretic theory. The book argues that, to the extent that functions purport to offer causal explanations for the existence of a trait, there are no viable alternatives to the selected effects view. The debate about biological functions is still as relevant and important to biology and philosophy as it ever was. Recent controversies surrounding the ENCODE Project Consortium in genetics, the nature of psychiatric classification, and the value of ecological restoration, all point to the continuing relevance to biology of philosophical discussion about the nature of functions. In philosophy, ongoing debates about the nature of biological information, intentionality, health and disease, mechanism, and even biological trait classification, are closely related to debates about biological functions.Philosophy of Science,2366-4495Biology—PhilosophyMedicine—PhilosophyPhilosophy of Biologyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E34010Philosophy of Medicinehttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/E34030Biology—Philosophy.Medicine—Philosophy.Philosophy of Biology.Philosophy of Medicine.574.01Garson Justinauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1063940MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910255335103321A Critical Overview of Biological Functions2535412UNINA