04388nam 22007935 450 991025531230332120200705061918.03-319-21278-810.1007/978-3-319-21278-4(CKB)3710000000454187(EBL)3567920(SSID)ssj0001534591(PQKBManifestationID)11875461(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001534591(PQKBWorkID)11496198(PQKB)10551838(DE-He213)978-3-319-21278-4(MiAaPQ)EBC3567920(PPN)187687455(EXLCZ)99371000000045418720150727d2016 u| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrAdvocacy Coalitions and Democratizing Media Reforms in Latin America Whose Voice Gets on the Air? /by Christof Mauersberger1st ed. 2016.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2016.1 online resource (292 p.)Contributions to Political Science,2198-7289Description based upon print version of record.3-319-21277-X Includes bibliographical references.Acknowlegements -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Democracy, Media and Their Democratization in Latin America -- 3 Analyzing Policy Change: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations -- 4 Argentina: Radical Change Amid Sharp Political Conflict -- 5 Brazil: Much Debate About No Reform -- 6 Broadening the Scope: Advocacy Coalitions and Media Reforms in Chile and Uruguay -- 7 Comparison and Generalization: Conditions for Media Democratization -- 8 Conclusions and Outlook.This book examines democratizing media reforms in Latin America. The author explains why some countries have recently passed such reforms in the broadcasting sector, while others have not. By offering a civil society perspective, the author moves beyond conventional accounts that perceive media reforms primarily as a form of government repression to punish oppositional media. Instead, he highlights the pioneering role of civil society coalitions, which have managed to revitalize the debate on communication rights and translated them into specific regulatory outcomes such as the promotion of community radio stations. The book provides an in-depth, comparative analysis of media reform debates in Argentina and Brazil (analyzing Chile and Uruguay as complementary cases), supported by original qualitative research. As such, it advances our understanding of how shifting power relations and social forces are affecting policymaking in Latin America and beyond.Contributions to Political Science,2198-7289Public policyCommunicationSociologyEconomicsComparative governmentMass mediaLawPublic Policyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911060Media Researchhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X29000International Political Economyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/912140Comparative Politicshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911040Media Sociologyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X22110IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Propertyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R15009Public policy.Communication.Sociology.Economics.Comparative government.Mass media.Law.Public Policy.Media Research.International Political Economy.Comparative Politics.Media Sociology.IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property.320Mauersberger Christofauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut788535BOOK9910255312303321Advocacy coalitions and democratizing media reforms in latin america1757838UNINA02174nam 22004693a 450 991032665000332120250513221951.097834125043973412504394(CKB)4100000008427737(OAPEN)1005045(ScCtBLL)2e67d16c-228d-4a09-8f1a-bf3b2e8d17f0(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/31041(Perlego)2328917(EXLCZ)99410000000842773720211214i20192019 uu geruuuuu---auuuutxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierInklusion-Exklusion : Funktion und Formen des Rechts in der spätmittelalterlichen Stadt. Das Beispiel Köln /Franz-Josef ArlinghausKölnBöhlau2019[s.l.] :Böhlau,2019.1 online resource (1 p.)9783412511654 341251165X Das Gerichtswesen der spätmittelalterlichen Stadt erscheint in vieler Hinsicht rätselhaft: Trotz reger Bautätigkeit tagten die Gerichte zumeist im Freien; wenngleich die Kommunen schon früh eine elaborierte Schriftlichkeit nutzten, fand das Prozessgeschehen meist mündlich statt, und obwohl der Rat nicht selten promovierte Juristen als Schreiber in Dienst nahm, urteilten an seinen Gerichten ausschließlich Laien. Das Buch unternimmt den Versuch, diese und andere Phänomene zu plausibilisieren, indem es sie auf die Leitunterscheidung von Zugehörigkeit und Nicht-Zugehörigkeit zurückführt. Als empirische Grundlage dient das umfangreiche Quellenmaterial der Stadt Köln, dass zur Zeit der Abfassung der Studie noch verfügbar war.Early modern history: c 1450/1500 to c 1700bicsscHistoryPOL000000HIS037010LAZHBJDEarly modern history: c 1450/1500 to c 1700Arlinghaus Franz-Josef296039ScCtBLLScCtBLLBOOK9910326650003321Inklusion-Exklusion2565498UNINA