02806nam 22005775 450 991025530310332120251030103746.09781137524270113752427810.1057/978-1-137-52427-0(CKB)3710000000685359(SSID)ssj0001674229(PQKBManifestationID)16473535(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001674229(PQKBWorkID)14874799(PQKB)10136101(DE-He213)978-1-137-52427-0(MiAaPQ)EBC4720194(Perlego)3489936(EXLCZ)99371000000068535920160517d2016 u| 0engurnn|008mamaatxtccrDebating the Future of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ The Evolution of a Moral Norm /by Pinar Gözen Ercan1st ed. 2016.London :Palgrave Macmillan UK :Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,2016.1 online resource (XVI, 202 p.) Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph9781137524263 113752426X Includes bibliographical references and index.Machine generated contents note: -- 1. Introduction 2. Humanitarian Intervention and the Path to R2P 3. International Law and the 'Right to Intervene' 4. Tracing the Process 5. Upholding the Responsibility? 6. The Way Forward 7. Conclusion: One's Reality, Another's Illusion.This study examines the relevance of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in responding to humanitarian challenges across the world. In proposing a number of revisionist alternatives, Ercan proposes a way forward for R2P, particularly regarding its Second and Third Pillars. Despite the debate shifting from a right to intervene towards a responsibility to protect, the conceptual and systemic limitations imposed on R2P via its institutionalisation have hampered its ability to consolidate change. In light of this, Ercan argues that R2P cannot make a positive contribution towards changing the international system without first being equipped with new powers.International relationsPeaceInternational RelationsPeace and Conflict StudiesInternational relations.Peace.International Relations.Peace and Conflict Studies.172/.4POL011000POL035010POL040020bisacshGözen Ercan Pinarauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1059630BOOK9910255303103321Debating the Future of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’2507415UNINA