03807nam 22005895 450 991025527960332120200704153651.03-319-53381-910.1007/978-3-319-53381-0(CKB)3710000001087253(DE-He213)978-3-319-53381-0(MiAaPQ)EBC4818767(PPN)259473669(EXLCZ)99371000000108725320170307d2017 u| 0engurnn|008mamaatxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierMaking Good Law or Good Policy? The Causes and Effects of State Supreme Court Judges’ Role Orientations /by Raymond V. Carman1st ed. 2017.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2017.1 online resource (VIII, 140 p. 4 illus.) 3-319-53380-0 Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters.1. An Empirical Puzzle -- 2. Role Theoretic Literature and a Judicial Role Theoretic Framework -- 3. Survey Design and Survey Results -- 4. Determining the Causes of Role Orientation -- 5. Role Orientation's Effect on Role Behavior -- 6. Conclusion.This book uses role theory to analyze the judicial decisions made by state supreme court judges. Grounded in the fields of anthropology, business management, psychology, and sociology, role theory holds that, for each position an individual occupies in society, he or she creates a role orientation, or a belief about the limits of proper behavior. Judicial role orientation is conceptualized as the stimuli that a judge feels can legitimately be allowed to influence his or her decision-making and, in the case of conflict among influences, what priorities to assign to different decisional criteria. This role orientation is generally seen as existing on a spectrum ranging from activist to restraintist. Using multi-faceted data collection and empirical testing, this book discusses the variation in judges’ role orientations, the role that personal institutional structure and judges' backgrounds play in determining judicial orientations, and the degree to which judges’ orientations affect their decision-making. The first study to provide cross-institutional research on state supreme court judges, this book expands and advances the literature on judicial role orientation. As such, this book will be of interest to graduate students and researchers studying political science, public policy, law, and the courts. .United States—Politics and governmentPublic policyConstitutional lawLaw—PhilosophyLawUS Politicshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911180Public Policyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/911060Constitutional Lawhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R17028Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal Historyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R11011United States—Politics and government.Public policy.Constitutional law.Law—Philosophy.Law.US Politics.Public Policy.Constitutional Law.Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.320.973Carman Raymond Vauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut865606BOOK9910255279603321Making Good Law or Good Policy1931848UNINA01084nam0-22002771i-450 991098028640332120250226103734.0(Aleph)000119865FED0120000920d1893----km-y0itay50------bafreFRa-------001yyProblèmes de baccalauréat(mathematiques)a l'usage des candidats aux baccalauréats de l'enseignement secondaire classique et de l'enseignement secondaire moderne et au baccalaureat ès sciencespar H. Vuibert2ème éd.ParisLibrairie Nony1893527 p.ill.22 cm001990001198650403321Vuibert,H.56377ITUNINARICAUNIMARCVisualizza la versione elettronica in Google Bookshttps://books.google.it/books?id=IrNKDK1dit8C&printsec=frontcover&hl=it&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false2050224BK9910980286403321M 2 IV 4628519NAP14NAP14Problèmes de baccalaureat341905UNINA