04619nam 22007935 450 991025527770332120230810191248.03-319-54060-210.1007/978-3-319-54060-3(CKB)3710000001151948(DE-He213)978-3-319-54060-3(MiAaPQ)EBC4837606(PPN)222234989(EXLCZ)99371000000115194820170406d2017 u| 0engurnn#008mamaatxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierAn International Perspective on Design Protection of Visible Spare Parts /by Dana Beldiman, Constantin Blanke-Roeser1st ed. 2017.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2017.1 online resource (XV, 132 p.)SpringerBriefs in Law,2192-85683-319-54059-9 Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters.1. Introduction -- 2. Business Aspects of the Spare Parts Industry -- 3. Design Protection Relating to Component Parts of Complex Products (Spare Parts) in the EU and the U.S. -- 4. Legislative Efforts Relating to Design Law in the Context of Spare Parts -- 5 Jurisprudence Relating to Design Law in the Context of Spare Parts -- 6. Considerations Towards a Compromise -- 7. Future Outlook: The Spare Parts Debate in the Era of 3D Printing -- 8. Conclusion. .This publication examines the legal aspects of the spare parts market from an IP perspective: specifically whether design protection for spare parts of a complex product extends to the spare part aftermarket, or whether that market should remain open to competition. The stakeholders’ equally weighty arguments that must be balanced against are, on the one hand, the property interest in an earned IP right in the design of the part; and on the other, enhanced competition, likely reflected in lower prices. The mounting tension between these two positions is manifest an increased number of lawsuits in both the US and the EU. This book provides a discussion of the legal issues involved in this debate from a global perspective, with special focus on the EU and the US. Part I contextualizes the legal debate by discussing the historical background, the competitive situation and the respective stakeholder positions. Part II examines the relevant legal questions on a comparative basis, evaluating the likelihood of its adoption in the jurisdictions examined. Concluding that adoption is unlikely, Part III proposes a number of possible considerations meant to further compromise. Part IV concludes with a future outlook, specifically in light of the impact of technological development on this market.SpringerBriefs in Law,2192-8568Information technologyLaw and legislationMass mediaLaw and legislationIndustrial designAutomobile industry and tradePrivate international lawConflict of lawsInternational lawComparative lawLawEuropeTrade regulationIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual PropertyIndustrial DesignAutomotive IndustryPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative LawEuropean LawInternational Economic Law, Trade LawInformation technologyLaw and legislation.Mass mediaLaw and legislation.Industrial design.Automobile industry and trade.Private international law.Conflict of laws.International law.Comparative law.LawEurope.Trade regulation.IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property.Industrial Design.Automotive Industry.Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law.European Law.International Economic Law, Trade Law.343.099Beldiman Danaauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut940312Blanke-Roeser Constantinauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/autBOOK9910255277703321An International Perspective on Design Protection of Visible Spare Parts2120381UNINA