04476nam 22006495 450 991025523200332120200703101108.01-137-56614-010.1057/9781137566140(CKB)3710000000653629(SSID)ssj0001668835(PQKBManifestationID)16460635(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001668835(PQKBWorkID)14826169(PQKB)11077589(DE-He213)978-1-137-56614-0(MiAaPQ)EBC4716772(EXLCZ)99371000000065362920160319d2016 u| 0engurnn|008mamaatxtccrBritish Women Writers and the Reception of Ancient Egypt, 1840-1910 Imperialist Representations of Egyptian Women /by Molly Youngkin1st ed. 2016.New York :Palgrave Macmillan US :Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,2016.1 online resource (XXVII, 229 p.) Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph1-137-57076-8 1-349-55520-7 Includes bibliographical references and index.Machine generated contents note: -- Introduction -- 1. Bound by an English Eye: Ancient Cultures, Imperialist Contexts, and Literary Representations of Egyptian Women -- 2. Acting as "the right hand... of God": Christianized Egyptian Women and Religious Devotion as Emancipation in Florence Nightingale's Fictionalized Treatises -- 3. "[T]o give new elements. .. as vivid as... long familiar types": Heroic Jewish Men, Dangerous Egyptian Women, and Equivocal Emancipation in George Eliot's Novels -- 4. "[W]e had never chosen a Byzantine subject... or one from Alexandria": Emancipation through Desire and the Eastern Limits of Beauty in Michael Field's Verse Dramas -- 5. The "sweetness of the serpent of old Nile": Revisionist Cleopatra and Spiritual Union as Emancipation in Elinor Glyn's Crosscultural Romances -- 6. "My ancestor, my sister": Ancient Heritage Imagery and Modern Egyptian Women Writers -- Afterword.This book shows how British women writers' encounters with textual and visual representations of ancient Egyptian women such as Hathor, Isis, and Cleopatra influenced how British women represented their own desired emancipation in novels, poetry, drama, romances, and fictional treatises. Molly Youngkin argues that canonical women writers such as Florence Nightingale and George Eliot—and less canonical figures such as Katharine Bradley and Edith Cooper (who wrote under the name 'Michael Field') and Elinor Glyn—incorporated their knowledge of ancient Egyptian women's cultural power in only a limited fashion when presenting their visions for emancipation. Often, they represented ancient Greek women or Italian Renaissance women rather than ancient Egyptian women, since Greek and Italian cultures were more familiar and less threatening to their British audience. This notable distinction opens up discussions about the history of British women, their writing, and the British view on gender in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.British literatureLiterature—History and criticismLiterature, Modern—19th centurySociologyBritish and Irish Literaturehttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/833000Literary Historyhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/813000Nineteenth-Century Literaturehttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/821000Gender Studieshttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/X35000British literature.Literature—History and criticism.Literature, Modern—19th century.Sociology.British and Irish Literature.Literary History.Nineteenth-Century Literature.Gender Studies.820.9/35832LIT000000LIT003000LIT004120LIT004290bisacshYoungkin Mollyauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1058275BOOK9910255232003321British Women Writers and the Reception of Ancient Egypt, 1840-19102498477UNINA