01814nas 2200565- 450 991024995290332120250928110222.02410-8200(DE-599)ZDB2844938-1(OCoLC)913714874(CKB)4160000000000075(CONSER)--2016263086(DE-599)2844938-1(EXLCZ)99416000000000007520150624a20159999 o-- -engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierAfrican journal of wildlife research[Bloubergstrand, South Africa] :[Southern African Wildlife Management Association],[2015]-1 online resourceRefereed/Peer-reviewed"Official Journal of the Southern African Wildlife Management Association."2410-7220 Afr. j. wildl. res.Wildlife researchWildlife managementAfrica, SouthernPeriodicalsAnimalsAfrica, SouthernPeriodicalsAnimals, WildVeterinary MedicineAnimalsfast(OCoLC)fst00809468Wildlife managementfast(OCoLC)fst01175323Africa, SouthernSouthern AfricafastPeriodical.Periodicals.fastPeriodicals.lcgftWildlife managementAnimalsAnimals, Wild.Veterinary Medicine.Animals.Wildlife management.Southern African Wildlife Management Association,JOURNAL9910249952903321African journal of wildlife research1927967UNINA05822nam 22006855 450 991063246910332120251009105844.09783031156915(electronic bk.)978303115690810.1007/978-3-031-15691-5(MiAaPQ)EBC7144100(Au-PeEL)EBL7144100(CKB)25430589800041(DE-He213)978-3-031-15691-5(PPN)266352723(EXLCZ)992543058980004120221121d2022 u| 0engurcnu||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierConflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings in the EU /by Alejandro Hernández López1st ed. 2022.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2022.1 online resource (231 pages)Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice,2524-4566 ;3Print version: Hernández López, Alejandro Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings in the EU Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2022 9783031156908 Includes bibliographical references and index.Chapter 1. Conflicts of criminal jurisdiction in the european union -- Conflict of criminal jurisdiction: scope of application -- Grounds for claiming jurisdiction -- Chapter 2. Legal Framework on Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction -- Treaties and Primary Law -- Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA -- The role of eurojust in the settlement of conflicts of jurisdiction -- Transposition into national law: the Spanish Example -- Transfer of criminal Proceedings -- Chapter 3. Conflicts of criminal jurisdiction and due process of law -- The ne bis in idem Principle -- Right to be tried by a tribunal previously estblished by law -- Principle of legality -- Rights and safeguards of the suspected or accused -- Allocation of jurisdiction and the victim´s interest -- Negative effects on the effective prosecution of crimes -- Chapter 4. Towards a new model of Settlement of Conflicts: Background and Methodology -- Rationale -- External Background: The Council of Europe Proposal -- EPPo as an (imperfect) example of a vertical mechanism -- Model Proposals: academia background and different approaches -- Chapter 5. De Lege Ferenda Model Proposals on Prevention and Settlement of Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction: Horizontal Model -- Horizontal model proposal: general aspects -- Substitution of framework decision 2009/948/JAI -- Regulation on transfer of criminal proceedings -- The Role of eurojust -- Judicial control -- Chapter 6. De Lege Ferenda Model Proposals on Prevention and Settlement of Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction: Vertical Model -- Vertical model proposal: general aspects -- Substitution of framework decision 2009/948/JAI -- Regulation On transfer of proceedings -- El papel de Eurojust -- Judicial control.Framework Decision 2009/948/JHA on the prevention and settlement of conflicts of exercise of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings established an ad hoc procedure for settling conflicts of criminal jurisdiction based on the mutual exchange of information and the establishment of direct consultations between the competent authorities with a view to reaching consensus on an effective solution. However, neither common legally binding criteria for deciding the best jurisdiction nor specific rules for the transfer of proceedings (which can occur after parallel proceedings have been identified) were established in this instrument, or in any other instrument adopted by the EU to date. This book analyses the current EU legal framework on conflicts of jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings, paying special attention to its numerous shortcomings and loopholes from a fundamental rights and due process of law perspective. The book begins with an assessment of the variousprinciples and grounds used by Member States for claiming criminal jurisdiction. Secondly, de lege lata EU procedure on the settlement of conflicts of criminal jurisdiction, as well as its implementation in Spain and Italy, are thoroughly examined. After discussing the main principles and fundamental rights at stake, the author proposes two alternative and original de lege ferenda models for the prevention and settlement of conflicts of criminal jurisdiction and transfer of criminal proceedings, exploring the different possibilities offered by the EU’s primary law.Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice,2524-4566 ;3LawEuropeCriminal lawInternational unificationCriminal lawConflict of lawsConflict of lawsInternational lawComparative lawEuropean Criminal LawCriminal Law and Criminal Procedure LawPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative LawLawCriminal lawInternational unification.Criminal law.Conflict of laws.Conflict of laws.International law.Comparative law.European Criminal Law.Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law.Private International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law.340.9Hernández López Alejandro1268169MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQ9910632469103321Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction and Transfer of Proceedings in the EU2982866UNINA