01791nam 2200481 450 991070396410332120150903132006.0(CKB)5470000002436099(OCoLC)919753869(EXLCZ)99547000000243609920150903j200812 ua 0engurcn|||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierThe GEOS-5 data assimilation system documentation of versions 5.0.1, 5.1.0, and 5.2.0 /M.M. Rienecker [and eleven others]Greenbelt, Maryland :National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center,December 2008.1 online resource (xii, 101 pages) color illustrations, mapsNASA/TM ;2008-104606.Technical report series on global modeling and data assimilation ;volume 27Title from title screen (viewed Sept. 3, 2015)."December 2008."Includes bibliographical references (pages 82-87).GEOS-5 data assimilation system Temperature distributionnasatVelocity distributionnasatWind velocitynasatAlgorithmsnasatTropospherenasatTemperature distribution.Velocity distribution.Wind velocity.Algorithms.Troposphere.Rienecker Michele M.1407537Goddard Space Flight Center,United States.National Aeronautics and Space Administration,GPOGPOBOOK9910703964103321The GEOS-5 data assimilation system3538957UNINA03500nam 2200673Ia 450 991022013150332120200520144314.01-281-43022-69786611430221(CKB)1000000000712899(EBL)345178(OCoLC)437212079(SSID)ssj0000204668(PQKBManifestationID)11168586(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000204668(PQKBWorkID)10208871(PQKB)11108783(MiAaPQ)EBC345178(Au-PeEL)EBL345178(CaPaEBR)ebr10227036(CaONFJC)MIL143022(oapen)doab114710(EXLCZ)99100000000071289920071211d2007 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrModernizing the federal government paying for performance /Silvia Montoya, John D. Graham1st ed.Santa Monica, CA RANDc20071 online resource (55 p.)Occasional paper / Rand CorporationDescription based upon print version of record.0-8330-4323-4 0-8330-4441-9 Includes bibliographical references.Cover; Preface; Contents; Figure; Tables; Summary; Abbreviations; Part One - Introduction; Part Two - Pay for Performance: Social Science Perspective; Part Three - PFP: Different Forms; Part Four - The Appraisal System: A Source of Concern; Personal Characteristics; Rater Training; Part Five - PFP in the Public Sector: Evidence; Pay for Performance in the State Systems; Part Six - PFP in the U.S. Federal Government; The GS Structure; How Are Employees Evaluated?; Is Performance Evaluation Linked to Pay?; Measuring Substandard Performance in the Federal GovernmentIs It Necessary to Modify the GS System?Part Seven - Some Departures from the GS; The DoD PFP Demonstration Projects; What Is Broadband Pay?; The SES; FDIC and IRS; Part Eight - Proposals to Change the GS; Part Nine - Burgeoning Opposition to PFP; The TSA; Opposition to the DoD's PFP Scheme; References; Related ReadingsEnhancing the performance of the civil service has been a central objective of the United States since the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 authorized a performance-based component to federal salary structures. In 2003, the National Commission on the Public Service, also known as the Volcker Commission, recommended that explicit pay-for-performance (PFP) systems be adopted more broadly throughout the federal government. The authors compare several proposals aimed at enhancing the role of PFP in the federal government: a White House proposal (the Working for America Act), which recommends that Occasional paper (Rand Corporation)Personnel managementUnited StatesEmployee motivationUnited StatesMerit payUnited StatesUnited StatesOfficials and employeesSalaries, etcPersonnel managementEmployee motivationMerit pay352.67Montoya Silvia935294Graham John D(John David),1956-935295MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910220131503321Modernizing the federal government2106472UNINA