03737nam 2200517z- 450 9910220084503321202310050-8330-9579-X(CKB)3710000000748268(oapen)doab115658(EXLCZ)99371000000074826820160718c2016uuuu uu 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierSustaining Service Members and Their FamiliesExploring Opportunities for Efficiency and Joint Provision of Services Using Nonappropriated FundsRAND Corporation20161 online resource0-8330-9429-7 Preface --Figures and Tables --Summary --Acknowledgments --Abbreviations --. 1.Introduction:Study Purpose and Focus --Organization of the Report --2.Program Area Descriptions: NAF Accounting and NAF Employee Benefits:NAF Accounting --NAF Employee Benefits --3.Eight Guidelines for Managing Change: Insight from Expert Literature and Case Studies:Organizational Change Literature --Eight Guidelines for Organizational Change --Case Studies Demonstrating Eight Change-Management Guidelines --Lessons Learned from Case Studies --4.Managing Change: Analysis and Ways Forward for NAF Accounting and NAF Employee Benefits:Applying the Eight Guidelines: NAF Accounting --Applying the Eight Guidelines: NAF Employee Benefits --5.NAF Accounting Consolidation: Cost Analysis and Results:NAF Accounting: Goals and Courses of Action --Approach to Cost Estimation --Data Collection --Methodology --Analysis --Results: Costs and Savings for NAF Accounting RIE Courses of Action --6.NAF Employee Benefits Efficiency: Cost Analysis and Results:NAF Employee Benefits: Setting Coordination Goals --Approach to Cost Estimation --Data Sources --Methodology --Results of Cost Estimation for NAF Employee Benefits RIE Recommendations --Total Costs for NAF Employee Benefits RIE Recommendations --7.Conclusions and Recommendations:Accounting --BenefitsRecommendations --APPENDIXES:A.Semistructured Discussion Guide --B.NAF Employee Benefits Data Gathering --C.Background Information for Case Studies --D.NAF Accounting Cost Detail --References.The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) sought to determine whether any administrative activities paid for with funding that was not congressionally appropriated could be consolidated-and, if so, whether consolidation would save costs. A DoD task force listed several areas for improvement, ranging from contracting to information technology. RAND reviewed the work of the task force and assessed specific recommendations.Sustaining Service Members and Their FamiliesMilitary and defence strategybicsscMilitary historybicsscPublic international law: treaties and other sourcesbicsscUnited StatesArmed ForcesCost effectivenessHistoryPolitical ScienceMilitary and defence strategyMilitary historyPublic international law: treaties and other sources355.6/1Connor Kathryn1241493Sims Carra S.Laureijs RianneHastings Jaime L.Van Abel KristinWilliams KaylaSchwille MichaelNational Defense Research Institute (U.S.),BOOK9910220084503321Sustaining service members and their families2889723UNINA