03523nam 2200625 a 450 991021998650332120240812192615.01-281-43012-99786611430122(CKB)1000000000535195(EBL)345183(OCoLC)476161236(SSID)ssj0000115748(PQKBManifestationID)11131882(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000115748(PQKBWorkID)10027116(PQKB)10839489(MiAaPQ)EBC345183(Au-PeEL)EBL345183(CaPaEBR)ebr10505595(EXLCZ)99100000000053519520071004d2007 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrBuilding partner capabilities for coalition operations /Jennifer D.P. Moroney ... [et al.]1st ed.Santa Monica, Calif. Rand Corp.20071 online resource (123 p.)"Prepared for the United States Army. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited."0-8330-4429-X 0-8330-4211-4 Includes bibliographical references (p. 97-100).Cover; Preface; Contents; Figures; Tables; Summary; Acknowledgments; Abbreviations; Chapter One - Introduction; Study Objectives; Approach; Organization of the Monograph; Chapter Two - The Challenge of Building Partner Capability and Capacity: Theory and Practice; Assumptions and Theory; The Challenge of Developing Metrics15; The Importance of Train and Equip Programs for U.S.Army Planning; Conclusion; Chapter Three - Identifying U.S. Army Capability Gaps for Coalition Operations; Strategic-Level Guidance Documents; Army Capabilities StudiesArmy Capability Gaps: A Composite, Illustrative ListConclusion; Chapter Four - Matching U.S. Army Capability Gaps to Candidate Partner Armies; Approach; Illustrating the Process; Conclusion; Chapter Five - Conclusions and Recommendations; Appendix A - Illustrative Train and Equip Programs; Appendix B - Explanation of Capability Gaps; Appendix C - Coalition Partner Contributions to U.S.-Led Operations; BibliographyOngoing operations and emerging mission requirements place a heavy burden on Army resources, resulting in capability gaps that the Army is unable to fill by itself. This report argues that one way to fill those gaps is by building the appropriate capabilities in allies and partner armies through focused security cooperation. It argues that U.S. Army planners need a more comprehensive understanding of the types of capability gaps that partner armies might fill and a process for matching those gaps with candidate|partner armies. The report begins by providing a theoretical context for building pCombined operations (Military science)Multinational armed forcesOrganizationMilitary planningUnited StatesUnited StatesMilitary relationsCombined operations (Military science)Multinational armed forcesOrganization.Military planning355.4/6Moroney Jennifer D. P.1973-899257United States.Army.MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910219986503321Building partner capabilities for coalition operations2025940UNINA