00959nam a2200265 a 4500991004001029707536 2707109479b1189555x-39ule_instDip.to Scienze Storiche Fil. e Geogr.ita515.09Renou, Xavier.532669L'infini aux limites du calcul :Anaximandre, Platon, Galilâee /Xavier Renou.Paris :F. Maspero,1978.374 p. :ill. ;22 cm.AlgorithmeBibliography: p. 359-367.CalcoloStoriaStoria della Filosofia.b1189555x02-04-1411-02-03991004001029707536LE009 STOR. 08.1-12712009000129801le009-E0.00-l- 00000.i1215619x11-02-03Infini aux limites du calcul902124UNISALENTOle00911-02-03ma -frefr 2103522nam 22005415 450 991015428480332120200424112023.09780226413877022641387X10.7208/9780226413877(CKB)4340000000022391(MiAaPQ)EBC4761020(StDuBDS)EDZ0001605528(DE-B1597)523384(OCoLC)965543771(DE-B1597)9780226413877(Perlego)1852985(EXLCZ)99434000000002239120200424h20162016 fg engurcnu||||||||rdacontentrdamediardacarrierExperiencing Other Minds in the Courtroom /Neal FeigensonChicago : University of Chicago Press, [2016]©20161 online resource (250 pages) illustrationsPreviously issued in print: 2016.9780226413730 022641373X Includes bibliographical references and index.Frontmatter -- Contents -- 1. Simulating Subjectivity -- 2. Knowing Other Minds, Simulating Worlds -- 3. Simulations as Evidence: Conceptual and Legal Overview -- 4. "That's What I See!" -- 5. The Science of Subjectivity -- 6. Ex Machina -- 7. Judging the Person -- 8. The Future of Simulations -- Acknowledgments -- Notes -- References -- IndexSometimes the outcome of a lawsuit depends upon sensations known only to the person who experiences them, such as the buzzing sound heard by a plaintiff who suffers from tinnitus after an accident. Lawyers, litigants, and expert witnesses are now seeking to re-create these sensations in the courtroom, using digital technologies to simulate litigants' subjective experiences and thus to help jurors know-not merely know about-what it is like to be inside a litigant's mind. But with this novel type of evidence comes a host of questions: Can anyone really know what it is like to have another person's sensory experiences? Why should courts allow jurors to see or hear these simulations? And how might this evidence alter the ways in which judges and jurors do justice? In Experiencing Other Minds in the Courtroom, Neal Feigenson turns the courtroom into a forum for exploring the profound philosophical, psychological, and legal ramifications of our efforts to know what other people's conscious experiences are truly like. Drawing on disciplines ranging from cognitive psychology to psychophysics to media studies, Feigenson harnesses real examples of digitally simulated subjective perceptions to explain how the epistemological value of this evidence is affected by who creates it, how it is made, and how it is presented. Through his close scrutiny of the different kinds of simulations and the different knowledge claims they make, Feigenson is able to suggest best practices for how we might responsibly incorporate such evidence into the courtroom.Evidence (Law)Judicial processExamination of witnessesEvidence (Law)Judicial process.Examination of witnesses.347.064Feigenson Neal, authttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut918768DE-B1597DE-B1597BOOK9910154284803321Experiencing Other Minds in the Courtroom2060360UNINA