01201nam0 2200313 450 00003968720141128085716.02-251-01033-520141128d1993----km-y0itaa50------balatfreFRLélius de l'amitiéCicérontexte établi et traduit par Robert CombèsQuatrième tirage revu et corrigéParis<<Les>> belles lettres1993LXXVIII, 68 p.20 cmCollection des universités de FranceTraduzione francese con testo latino a fronte2001Collection des universités de FranceDe amicitia / Cicero, Marcus Tullius15650180.9014(22. ed.)Filosofia antica. 999-1 a. CCicero,Marcus Tullius<106-43 a.C.>82411Combès,RobertITUniversità della Basilicata - B.I.A.REICATunimarc000039687De amicitia15650UNIBASEXT0130120141128BAS010857BAS01BAS01BOOKBASA1Polo Storico-UmanisticoGENCollezione generale79611L796112014112802Prestabile Generale01142oam 2200253z- 450 991014592630332120050113090532.088-430-2858-8(CKB)1000000000279192(EXLCZ)99100000000027919220170717c2004uuuu -u- -itaLe colonie penali nell'Europa dell'Ottocento atti del convegno internazionale organizzato dal Dipartimento di storia dell'Università di Sassari e dal Parco nazionale dell'Asinara (Porto Torres, 25 maggio 2001) /a cura di Mario Da Passano ; introduzione di Guido Neppi ModonaColonie penali nell'Europa dell'Ottocento Le colonie penali nell'Europa dell'Ottocento : atti del Convegno internazionale ... : Porto Torres, 25 maggio 2001Le colonie penali nell'Europa dell'Ottocento Penal coloniesEuropeHistory19th centuryCongressesPenal coloniesHistory365/.34Da Passano Mario144958BOOK9910145926303321Le colonie penali nell'Europa dell'Ottocento2871621UNINA04514nam 2200697 450 991078726890332120210512233031.00-8014-7192-30-8014-7193-110.7591/9780801471933(CKB)3710000000311090(OCoLC)897815016(CaPaEBR)ebrary10993837(SSID)ssj0001382346(PQKBManifestationID)12594236(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001382346(PQKBWorkID)11459464(PQKB)11220075(StDuBDS)EDZ0001510479(OCoLC)966925028(MdBmJHUP)muse51814(DE-B1597)478700(OCoLC)979576559(DE-B1597)9780801471933(Au-PeEL)EBL3138681(CaPaEBR)ebr10993837(CaONFJC)MIL683586(MiAaPQ)EBC3138681(EXLCZ)99371000000031109020141220h20142014 uy 0engur|||||||||||txtccrBarriers to bioweapons the challenges of expertise and organization for weapons development /Sonia Ben Ouagrham-GormleyIthaca, New York :Cornell University Press,2014.©20141 online resource (237 p.)Cornell Studies in Security AffairsIncludes index.1-322-52304-5 0-8014-5288-0 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Contents --Preface and Acknowledgments --1. The Bioproliferation Puzzle --2. The Acquisition and Use of Specialized Knowledge --3. Impediments and Facilitators of Bioweapons Development --4. The American Bioweapons Program: Struggling with a Split Personality Disorder --5. The Soviet Bioweapons Program: Failed Integration --6. Small Bioweapons Programs and the Constraints of Covertness --7. Preventing Bioweapons Developments: Policy Implications --Appendix 1: American Bioweapons Program: Contractors --Appendix 2: American Bioweapons Program: Approximate Bud get Figures --Notes --IndexIn both the popular imagination and among lawmakers and national security experts, there exists the belief that with sufficient motivation and material resources, states or terrorist groups can produce bioweapons easily, cheaply, and successfully. In Barriers to Bioweapons, Sonia Ben Ouagrham-Gormley challenges this perception by showing that bioweapons development is a difficult, protracted, and expensive endeavor, rarely achieving the expected results whatever the magnitude of investment. Her findings are based on extensive interviews she conducted with former U.S. and Soviet-era bioweapons scientists and on careful analysis of archival data and other historical documents related to various state and terrorist bioweapons programs. Bioweapons development relies on living organisms that are sensitive to their environment and handling conditions, and therefore behave unpredictably. These features place a greater premium on specialized knowledge. Ben Ouagrham-Gormley posits that lack of access to such intellectual capital constitutes the greatest barrier to the making of bioweapons. She integrates theories drawn from economics, the sociology of science, organization, and management with her empirical research. The resulting theoretical framework rests on the idea that the pace and success of a bioweapons development program can be measured by its ability to ensure the creation and transfer of scientific and technical knowledge. The specific organizational, managerial, social, political, and economic conditions necessary for success are difficult to achieve, particularly in covert programs where the need to prevent detection imposes managerial and organizational conditions that conflict with knowledge production.Cornell studies in security affairs.Biological arms controlFormer Soviet republicsBiological arms controlUnited StatesBiological arms controlFormer Soviet republics.Biological arms control358/.388MZ 6800rvkBen Ouagrham-Gormley Sonia1470461MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910787268903321Barriers to bioweapons3682318UNINA