04009 am 22007693u 450 991014163910332120221206172729.09783863951009(ebook)(CKB)2670000000344222(MARCnow)har135001048(MH)013652856-2(SSID)ssj0000889699(PQKBManifestationID)12440355(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000889699(PQKBWorkID)10882731(PQKB)10972797(FrMaCLE)OB-gup-608(EXLCZ)99267000000034422220130618d2012 uy 0engurm|#---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierNegotiating tradition the pragmatics of international deliberations on cultural property /Stefan GrothGöttingen :Universitätsverlag Göttingen,2012.1 online resource (ix, 190 pages ) illustrations; digital file(s)Göttingen Studies in Cultural Property ;Volume 4Dissertation.Includes bibliographical references.Communicative interactions in international negotiations on cultural property not only provide information about the emergence and proliferation of arguments, rhetorics, and registers, but also permit valuable insights into actors’ positions, strategies and alliances. They significantly influence local and national practices and views related to cultural property debates. What can be gained from a deep analysis of the communicative patterns and strategies that actors engage in – the entailing text and talk of negotiations – is a better understanding of the process itself: how do different actors argue, what kind of strategies and rhetorics do they use, to which instruments and institutions do they refer, and in what way do actors react to each other? An analysis of communicative interactions contributes to the question of how international negotiations work. The analytic inclusion of sociolinguistic practices allows insights into positions, strategies, and perspectives pertaining to cultural property. By looking at not only what actors say, but also at how and in what contexts they do so, it is possible to make more accurate statements about their positions and perceptions in cultural property debates. As these communicative interactions influence outcomes considerably, an approach from linguistic anthropology is not only beneficial for an understanding of specific negotiations, but also for the analysis of broader cultural property issues.Göttinger Studien zu Cultural Property ;4.NegotiationMethodologyPragmaticsCultural propertyProtectionIntellectual propertyProtectionCultural policyDiscourse analysisCultural propertyProtection (International law)NegotiationMethodologyPragmaticsProtectionCultural propertyProtectionIntellectual propertyCultural policySocial SciencesHILCCPsychologyHILCCNegotiationMethodology.Pragmatics.Cultural propertyProtection.Intellectual propertyProtection.Cultural policy.Discourse analysis.Cultural propertyProtection (International law)NegotiationMethodologyPragmaticsProtectionCultural propertyProtectionIntellectual propertyCultural policySocial SciencesPsychologyGroth Stefan801018NyNyMARNyNyMARUkMaJRU9910141639103321Negotiating tradition2258854UNINA02534nam0 2200373 450000003730820250225160637.09791221103472e-book pdf20250225d2023----km-y0itay50------baitaITy-------001yysdoug----uuuuuVoluntas ut ratiorisorsa elettronicasullo statuto della volontà nel diritto penaleMauro RoncoTorinoGiappichelli2023VI, 155 p.24 cm1 testo elettronicoAnima juris ratio5Dati testuali (1 file)Modalità di accesso: World Wide WebIndice del libro free access:http://digital.casalini.it/9791221153514\201CVoluntas ut ratio. Sullo statuto della volontà nel diritto penale\201D è una monografia di diritto penale rivolta agli studiosi della materia, agli avvocati, ai magistrati e ai pratici del diritto. Dopo avere recuperato le radici della \201Cvolontà\201D e della \201Clibertà\201D nel pensiero occidentale ed avere esaminato la curvatura riduzionistica tipica della filosofia e della criminalistica moderne, l\2019Autore di Voluntas ut ratio affida al penalista di oggi alcune riflessioni circa i dogmi del comportamentismo psicologico e la successiva riemersione della volontà e della libertà nella psicologia contemporanea. All\2019esito dell\2019indagine, Mauro Ronco formula alcune originali conclusioni sul ruolo della libertà nel diritto penale, sull\2019imputazione come presupposto di responsabilità, sulla c.d. \201Ccolpevolezza normativa\201D (nozione sottoposta a serrata critica dogmatica), sulla capacità di imputazione e sul carattere essenzialmente deficitario della volontà e della libertà umane, con alcune proposte conclusive in chiave construens.2001Anima juris ratio5Voluntas ut ratio4315523Filosofia. Determinismo e indeterminismoDiritto penaleDiritto criminaleAnimus <Diritto>Volontà <diritto>345.040123Responsabilità penale e colpevolezza. Filosofia e teoriaRonco,Mauro070231274ITUNIPARTHENOPE20250211RICAUNIMARChttp://digital.casalini.it/9791221153514Accesso limitato alla rete di Ateneo Università di Napoli "Parthenope"Data ultima consultazione: 2025-02-25000037308E-BOOK49891NAVA12025Voluntas ut ratio4315523UNIPARTHENOPE