03533nam 22006374a 450 991013999380332120200520144314.01-282-40106-8978661240106090-474-2809-910.1163/ej.9789004174634.i-308(CKB)1000000000821761(EBL)467970(OCoLC)644523376(SSID)ssj0000335334(PQKBManifestationID)11272615(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000335334(PQKBWorkID)10273939(PQKB)10977266(OCoLC)298188045(nllekb)BRILL9789047428091(Au-PeEL)EBL467970(CaPaEBR)ebr10349195(CaONFJC)MIL240106(MiAaPQ)EBC467970(PPN)174401604(EXLCZ)99100000000082176120090122d2009 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrBoundaries of discourse in the International Court of Justice mapping arguments in Arab territorial disputes /by Michelle L. Burgis1st ed.Leiden ;Boston Martinus Nijhoff Publishers20091 online resource (340 p.)Nijhoff eBook titles 2009Description based upon print version of record.90-04-17463-X Includes bibliographical references (p. [275]-300) and index.Listening for silences in and beyond the courtroom : methodological tools for understanding ICJ territorial disputes -- Between faith and place : Arab-Islamic approaches to authority and territory in theory and practice -- Sanctioning colonial legacies in the Sahara : the construction of postcolonial selfhood in the Libya/Chad territorial dispute -- (De)limiting the past for future gain : the relationship between statehood, colonialism, and oil in the Qatar v Bahrain territorial dispute -- Determining the limits of law in the Western Sahara case -- Discourses of division : law, politics, and the ICJ advisory opinion on the legal consequences of the construction of a wall in the occupied Palestinian territory.How can Third World experiences of colonialism and statehood be expressed within the confines of the International Court of Justice? How has the discourse of international law developed to reflect postcolonial realities of ‘universal’ statehood? In a close and critical reading of four territorial disputes spanning the Arab World, Burgis explores the extent to which international law can be used to speak for and speak to non-European experiences of authority over territory. The book draws on recent, critical international legal scholarship to question the ability of contemporary, international adjudication to address Third World grievances from the past. A comparative analysis of the cases suggests that international law remains a discourse only capable of capturing a limited range of non-European experiences during and after colonialism.Boundary disputesJurisdiction (International law)Boundary disputes.Jurisdiction (International law)341.4/2Burgis Michelle L522716MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910139993803321Boundaries of discourse in the International Court of Justice825698UNINA