05480nam 22006252 450 991013661290332120170201170828.01-316-77176-81-316-81092-51-316-81101-81-108-46512-91-139-85594-81-316-81110-71-316-81146-81-316-81119-0(CKB)3710000000894276(EBL)4697952(MiAaPQ)EBC4697952(UkCbUP)CR9781139855945(EXLCZ)99371000000089427620121106d2016|||| uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierCulpable carelessness recklessness and negligence in the criminal law /Findlay Stark[electronic resource]Cambridge :Cambridge University Press,2016.1 online resource (xxii, 327 pages) digital, PDF file(s)Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 31 Jan 2017).1-107-03890-1 1-316-81137-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Cover; Half-title ; Title page ; Copyright information; Dedication ; Table of contents ; Acknowledgements ; List of Abbreviations ; Table of Cases ; Table of Legislation ; 1 Introduction ; An Overview of the Argument ; Risks and Wrongdoing ; Why Is Justification Required?Justifying Risk-taking 2 The Doctrinal Trend towards the Standard Account ; England and Wales ; Negligence ; Voluntary Intoxication ; Summary ; Canada ; Voluntary Intoxication ; Summary ; Australia ; The Common Law Jurisdictions ; The Older Codes ; The Modern CodesVoluntary Intoxication in the Codified Jurisdictions Summary ; The United States ; The MPC's Definitions ; Virtually Full Adoption of the MPC's Definitions ; Virtually Full Adoption of the MPC's Definitions with Different Labels ; Adoption of the MPC's Definitions, with EditsPartial Adoption of the MPC's Definitions Non-adoption of the MPC's Definitions ; No General Definitions ; Voluntary Intoxication ; Summary ; New Zealand ; Summary ; Scotland ; Voluntary Intoxication ; Summary ; Conclusion ; 3 Consistency in DefinitionDefending Multiple Definitions An Alternative Approach ; Duff on Communication ; The Boundaries of Definition ; Robinson on Conduct and Adjudication ; 'Thin Ice' and Discretion ; Practical Concerns ; A Criminalisation Concern ; An Over-inclusiveness Concern ; Conclusion4 From Awareness to BeliefThe question of when a person is culpable for taking an unjustified risk of harm has long been controversial in Anglo-American criminal law doctrine and theory. This survey of the approaches adopted in England and Wales, Canada, Australia, the United States, New Zealand and Scotland argues that they are converging, to differing extents, around a 'Standard Account' of culpable unjustified risk-taking. This Standard Account distinguishes between awareness-based culpability (recklessness) and inadvertence-based culpability (negligence) for unjustified risk-taking. With reference to criminal law theory and philosophical literature, the author argues that, when explained appropriately, the Standard Account is defensible and practical. Defending the Standard Account involves analysing in depth a number of controversial matters, including the meaning of advertence/awareness, the role of attitudes such as indifference in culpable risk-taking, and the question of whether negligence should be used in the criminal law.Negligence, CriminalCriminal intentCriminal lawNegligence, Criminal.Criminal intent.Criminal law.345/.04LAW026000bisacshStark Findlay850774UkCbUPUkCbUPBOOK9910136612903321Culpable carelessness1899641UNINA