00895nam0-22003131i-450-99000184460040332120021010000184460FED01000184460(Aleph)000184460FED0100018446020021010d--------km-y0itay50------baitaHarvesting and packing grapes in CaliforniaH.E. Jacob, J.R. Herman.BerleleyUniversity of California1925.44 p.23 cmBullettin 390, June 1925.Uva664.804 8Jacob,Heinrich Eduard<1889-1967>81065Herman,J. R.ITUNINARICAUNIMARCBK99000184460040332160 MISC. B 49/13FAGBCFAGBCHarvesting and packing grapes in California414873UNINAING0104733nam 2200673 450 991082516200332120210427032349.00-8122-1000-X10.9783/9780812210002(CKB)3710000000199193(OCoLC)889315173(CaPaEBR)ebrary10895003(SSID)ssj0001267751(PQKBManifestationID)11734436(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001267751(PQKBWorkID)11264991(PQKB)10448373(OCoLC)885456120(MdBmJHUP)muse35450(DE-B1597)449872(DE-B1597)9780812210002(Au-PeEL)EBL3442392(CaPaEBR)ebr10895003(CaONFJC)MIL682703(MiAaPQ)EBC3442392(EXLCZ)99371000000019919320140723h20142014 uy 0engurcnu||||||||txtccrThe Neoplatonic Socrates /edited by Danielle A. Layne and Harold Tarrant ; contributors Crystal Addey [and nine others]1st ed.Philadelphia, Pennsylvania :University of Pennsylvania Press,2014.©20141 online resource (263 p.)Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph1-322-51421-6 0-8122-4629-2 Includes bibliographical references and index.Front matter --Contents --Introduction --Chapter 1. Socratic Love in Neoplatonism --Chapter 2. Plutarch and Apuleius on Socrates’ Daimonion --Chapter 3. The Daimonion of Socrates: Daimones and Divination in Neoplatonism --Chapter 4. Socrates in the Neoplatonic Psychology of Hermias --Chapter 5. The Character of Socrates and the Good of Dialogue Form: Neoplatonic Hermeneutics --Chapter 6. Hypostasizing Socrates --Chapter 7. Socratic Character: Proclus on the Function of Erotic Intellect --Chapter 8. The Elenctic Strategies of Socrates: The Alcibiades I and the Commentary of Olympiodorus --Chapter 9. Akrasia and Enkrateia in Simplicius’s Commentary on Epictetus’s Encheiridion --Chapter 10. The Many-Voiced Socrates: Neoplatonist Sensitivity to Socrates’ Change of Register --Conclusion --Appendix: The Reception of Socrates in Late Antiquity: Authors, Texts, and Notable References --Notes --Bibliography --Contributors --General Index --AcknowledgmentsToday the name Socrates invokes a powerful idealization of wisdom and nobility that would surprise many of his contemporaries, who excoriated the philosopher for corrupting youth. The problem of who Socrates "really" was—the true history of his activities and beliefs—has long been thought insoluble, and most recent Socratic studies have instead focused on reconstructing his legacy and tracing his ideas through other philosophical traditions. But this scholarship has neglected to examine closely a period of philosophy that has much to reveal about what Socrates stood for and how he taught: the Neoplatonic tradition of the first six centuries C.E., which at times decried or denied his importance yet relied on his methods. In The Neoplatonic Socrates, leading scholars in classics and philosophy address this gap by examining Neoplatonic attitudes toward the Socratic method, Socratic love, Socrates's divine mission and moral example, and the much-debated issue of moral rectitude. Collectively, they demonstrate the importance of Socrates for the majority of Neoplatonists, a point that has often been questioned owing to the comparative neglect of surviving commentaries on the Alcibiades, Gorgias, Phaedo, and Phaedrus, in favor of dialogues dealing explicitly with metaphysical issues. Supplemented with a contextualizing introduction and a substantial appendix detailing where evidence for Socrates can be found in the extant literature, The Neoplatonic Socrates makes a clear case for the significant place Socrates held in the education and philosophy of late antiquity. Contributors: Crystal Addey, James M. Ambury, John F. Finamore, Michael Griffin, Marilynn Lawrence, Danielle A. Layne, Christina-Panagiota Manolea, François Renaud, Geert Roskam, Harold Tarrant.NeoplatonismAncient Studies.Classics.Philosophy.Neoplatonism.183/.2Layne Danielle A.Tarrant HaroldAddey CrystalMiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910825162003321Neoplatonic Socrates1552794UNINA03520nam 2200481z- 450 991013640080332120210212(CKB)3710000000612083(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/59792(oapen)doab59792(EXLCZ)99371000000061208320202102d2015 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierSpatial and non-spatial aspects of neglectFrontiers Media SA20151 online resource (151 p.)Frontiers Research Topics2-88919-584-8 Neglect is one of the most impressive neuropsychological disorder, for both its theoretical and clinical relevance. Besides being very common and disabling, it is highly informative for understanding normal cognitive functioning. The hallmark of neglect is the failure to attend to the contralesional hemispace. However, several studies have recently highlighted that additional deficits, not attributable to a spatial bias, are associated to the impaired contralesional hemispace processing. Moreover, manifestations of neglect tend to be particularly heterogeneous and often dissociate according to the spatial domain being investigated (e.g., body space, space within reaching, space beyond reaching, imaginal space). Heterogeneity in neglect patients also means that dissociations across different tasks in a single patient are more the rule than the exception. Evidence suggests that some of these dissociations can be readily explained by taking into account the amount of available attentional resources as a major determinant for the presence and the severity of neglect. There is no doubt that neglect patients provide a wealth of information about the functioning of systems subserving attentional orienting and spatial processing. Moreover, their performance also show that some non-spatial deficits are tightly coupled with more classic contralesional spatial deficits. It seems however still unclear to what extent these non-spatial deficits are an intrinsic characteristic of neglect or whether they are to be considered unspecific effects of the often massive brain lesions suffered by the patients. From the clinical point of view, neglect is a disorder that dramatically affects patients and their caregivers, because it severely limits the individuals' autonomy and motor recovery after brain damage. For these reasons neglect is a disorder that is worth rehabilitating. To be effective, neglect rehabilitation should be based on the knowledge of what cognitive aspects are impaired and it should be focused on improving daily-life performance. For these reasons, it is also important to detect and quantify subtle forms of neglect.NeurosciencesbicsscAwarenessbrain damagecognitive impairmentsneglectnon spatial attentionperipersonal spacePersonal Spacespatial attentionspatial cognitionStrokeNeurosciencesCarlo Umiltaauth242134Mario BonatoauthMarco ZorziauthKonstantinos PriftisauthBOOK9910136400803321Spatial and non-spatial aspects of neglect3024633UNINA