00993nam0-22002891i-450-99000657812040332120111014144603.0000657812FED01000657812(Aleph)000657812FED0100065781220010426d1966----km-y0itay50------baitaITy-------001yyDichiarazione di incostituzionalità dei Consigli di Prefettura e giudizi di appello pendenti dinanzi alla Corte dei ContiFrancesco Teresi[S.l.s.n.1966]6 p.22 cmEstr. da: La Finanza Pubblica, n.6, novembre-dicembre 1966Teresi,Francesco1790ITUNINARICAUNIMARCBK990006578120403321BUSTA I G 921282FSPBCFSPBCDichiarazione di incostituzionalità dei Consigli di Prefettura e giudizi di appello pendenti dinanzi alla Corte dei Conti623284UNINA03474oam 2200733zu 450 991013354470332120250709221344.0978235671299823567129929782356710871235671087610.4000/books.pressesmines.564(CKB)3390000000053669(SSID)ssj0001000923(PQKBManifestationID)12459093(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001000923(PQKBWorkID)10968486(PQKB)11207500(FrMaCLE)OB-pressesmines-564(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/54785(PPN)182826872(FR-PaCSA)88828634(FRCYB88828634)88828634(oapen)doab54785(EXLCZ)99339000000005366920160829d2012 uy enguu||||||m||||txtccrNormative experience in Internet politicsPresses des Mines2012[Place of publication not identified]Transvalor Presses des Mines20121 online resource (265 p.) Collection Sciences sociales Normative experience in Internet politics Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph9782911256578 2911256573 The ways in which the Internet is managed and controlled -often labeled as Internet Governance- are usually considered as standing on four main pillars: Technology, Market Laws, State Regulation and Uses. Nevertheless, its specific features, the consequences of the plurality of norms it involves and of the decision-making processes it entails are rarely addressed in a comprehensive analysis. This book explores the Internet’s functioning both as a practical-intellectual experience and a political challenge. By means of several case studies, it proposes a substantial and reflexive treatment of multileveled, formal or informal Internet Politics. The book’s overall endeavor is to outline an understanding of what is -or may be- a “digital common good”. The authors are members of a European academic team gathered by the Vox Internet research program’s meetings. They adopt a multi-disciplinary approach, embedding technological innovation in the field of social sciences (communication studies, sociology, law, political science and philosophy).InternetPolitical aspectsCase studiesInternetSocial aspectsInternetLaw and legislationSociology & Social HistoryHILCCSocial SciencesHILCCSocial ChangeHILCCInternetPolitical aspectsInternetSocial aspects.InternetLaw and legislation.Sociology & Social HistorySocial SciencesSocial ChangeFrançoise Massit-Folléa Cécile Méadel, Laurence Monnoyer-Smith (dir.)auth1356421Méadel CécileMonnoyer-Smith LaurenceMâeadel CâecileMonnoyer-Smith LaurenceMassit-Folléa FrançoiseMassit-Follâea FranðcoisePQKBBOOK9910133544703321Normative experience in Internet politics3360940UNINA