02903oam 2200625 450 991013347650332120221206104417.02-84788-434-310.4000/books.enseditions.1058(CKB)3390000000053535(SSID)ssj0001110832(PQKBManifestationID)12502458(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001110832(PQKBWorkID)11130429(PQKB)10309529(FrMaCLE)OB-enseditions-1058(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/54716(PPN)180611534(EXLCZ)99339000000005353520160829d2009 uy |freu|bu#---uuuuutxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierLe nom propre en Inde considérations sur le mécanisme référentiel /Émilie AussantENS Éditions2009France :ENS,20091 online resource (163 pages ) digital file(s)Langages Le nom propre en IndeBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: MonographPrint version: 9782847881769 Through the study of numerous Sanskrit technical texts, the present study aims to show and explain how the specificity of the semiotic status of proper names has been approached in the three traditional Indian disciplines of vy ā kara ṇ a (grammar), the ny at are (logical) and m ī m at m s at (exegesis), disciplines that put the reflection on language at the centre of their concerns. The question of the "meaning" of proper names has given rise to many reflections, both in the West and in India.If the debates, in the West, mainly concern logic and philosophy, linguistics participating only marginally, it is primarily grammarians ( vaiy à kara ṇ a ) and logicians ( naiy à yika ) who, in India, got hold of the problem. This work shows how the former mostly defended the idea that proper nouns denote and connote, while among the latter, it is the idea of ​​a direct denotation, without connotation, which was most often supported.Names, PersonalIndiaNames, SanskritRelated Historical SciencesHILCCHistory & ArchaeologyHILCCGenealogyHILCCnom propreconvention linguistiquelangues indiennesréférence (linguistique)sanskritNames, PersonalNames, SanskritRelated Historical SciencesHistory & ArchaeologyGenealogyAussant Émilie872194PQKBUkMaJRUBOOK9910133476503321Le nom propre en Inde1947284UNINA