00645nam 2200169z- 450 9910712377603321(CKB)5470000002492354(EXLCZ)99547000000249235420230509c2015uuuu -u- -engDesign and methods of the Southeast Stream Quality Assessment (SESQA), 2014U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological SurveyReston, VirginiaDesign and methods of the Southeast Stream Quality Assessment BOOK9910712377603321Design and methods of the Southeast Stream Quality Assessment (SESQA), 20143318279UNINA03526nam 22005775 450 991088109420332120240818130242.0978303154290930315429089783031542916(electronic book)3031542916(electronic book)10.1007/978-3-031-54291-6(MiAaPQ)EBC31606747(Au-PeEL)EBL31606747(CKB)34075068100041(DE-He213)978-3-031-54291-6(EXLCZ)993407506810004120240818d2024 u| 0engurun#|||a|||atxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierRetrospective Pledge Voting and Political Accountability The Costs of Broken Promises /by Theres Matthieß1st ed. 2024.Cham :Springer Nature Switzerland :Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan,2024.1 online resource (255 pages) illustrationsPrint version: Matthieß, Theres Retrospective Pledge Voting and Political Accountability Cham : Palgrave Macmillan,c2024 9783031542909 Includes bibliographical references and index.1. Election pledges, democratic representation and voting -- 2. How pledge performance affects voting -- 3. A threefold empirical investigation of RPV -- 4. RPV at the aggregate level: Evidence from observational data -- 5. RPV at the group level: Evidence from survey data -- 6. RPV at the micro level: Evidence from experimental data -- 7. New evidence on RPV -- 8. A good or bad sign for democracy?.This book examines retrospective pledge voting; the phenomenon of whether and under which conditions citizens are likely to withdraw their support for political parties that have failed to turn their pre-election pledges into tangible policies once they have joined government. It puts forward a new theoretical framework on retrospective pledge voting. Whilst one would expect voters to punish government parties that have broken their promises by refusing to vote for them at the next election, little research has been done to show whether, and under what contexts, this is actually the case. Adopting a multi-methods approach, the book demonstrates that citizens do punish government parties that have shown a poor performance in fulfilling their election pledges, and that more sceptical citizens withnegative pre-existing opinions punish pledge breakage more severely. Bringing together research on election pledges, government performance and voting, the book will appeal to all those interested in democratic representation, politics, public policy, and voter-party linkages. Theres Matthieß is Assistant Professor of Empirical Democracy Research at the University of Göttingen, Germany.ElectionsPolitical leadershipPolitical scienceElectoral PoliticsPolitical LeadershipGovernance and GovernmentElections.Political leadership.Political science.Electoral Politics.Political Leadership.Governance and Government.324.6Matthiess Theres1988-1768761MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQ9910881094203321Retrospective pledge voting and political accountability4233073UNINA00916cam0-2200325---450 99000416591040332120251119103019.00-226-45041-4000416591FED01000416591(Aleph)000416591FED0100041659119990604d1972----km-y0itay50------baengUSy-------001cy<<The >>presence of mythLeszek Kolakowskitraslated by Adam CzerniawskiChicagoThe University Press1972XII, 138 p.22 cmMito128Kolakowski,Leszek<1927-2009>62510ITUNINARICAUNIMARCBK990004165910403321199.1 KOLL 01DIP.FIL.1495FLFBCP.1 FRM 110 BIS9715 Bibl.FLFBCFLFBCPresence of myth475724UNINA