00804nam0-22002891i-450-99000032256040332120001010000032256FED01000032256(Aleph)000032256FED0100003225620001010d--------km-y0itay50------baitay-------001yyElemente und akkumulatoren ihre theorie und technipVon W. Bein.LeipzigVerlag von Barth1908VII,241 p., 24 cm660Bein,Willi18026ITUNINARICAUNIMARCBK99000032256040332104 141-8ELETTR. 432DINCHDINCHElemente und akkumulatoren ihre theorie und technip130415UNINAING0103894nam 22006495 450 991025519580332120200703014815.03-319-24376-410.1007/978-3-319-24376-4(CKB)3710000000539382(EBL)4199789(DE-He213)978-3-319-24376-4(MiAaPQ)EBC4199789(PPN)228319811(EXLCZ)99371000000053938220151216d2016 u| 0engur|n|---|||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierJudicial Sales of Ships A Comparative Study /by Lief Bleyen1st ed. 2016.Cham :Springer International Publishing :Imprint: Springer,2016.1 online resource (216 p.)Hamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs, International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs at the University of Hamburg,1614-2462 ;36Description based upon print version of record.3-319-24374-8 Includes bibliographical references.Introduction -- Existing international and European legal framework for judicial sales of ships -- Comparative analysis: Belgium -- Comparative analysis: The Netherlands -- Comparative analysis: England and Wales -- Comparative analysis: Summary -- International legal framework for recognition of foreign judicial sales of ships -- Main conclusions.This work focuses on a specific aspect of the enforcement of maritime claims, namely judicial sales of ships, a procedure creditors typically resort to in the event of an irreversible default situation. A substantial part of the book approaches the topic from a comparative perspective, the goal being to assess the similarities and differences of the judicial sale procedure between three specific jurisdictions: Belgium, the Netherlands, and England & Wales. In this study, the comparison is used to further analyse the impacts of these differences on the effectiveness and reliability of the judicial sale procedure in each jurisdiction and also forms the basis for assessing the feasibility of harmonising judicial sale procedures and fostering their acceptance. Considering the international character typical of judicial sales of ships, conflict-of-law questions are very likely to arise during these procedures. Accordingly, the comparative study, where appropriate, is viewed against a private international law background.Hamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs, International Max Planck Research School for Maritime Affairs at the University of Hamburg,1614-2462 ;36Conflict of lawsConflict of lawsLaw of the seaInternational lawLaw—EuropePrivate International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law https://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R14002Law of the Sea, Air and Outer Spacehttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R19060European Lawhttps://scigraph.springernature.com/ontologies/product-market-codes/R20000Conflict of laws.Conflict of laws.Law of the sea.International law.Law—Europe.Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law .Law of the Sea, Air and Outer Space.European Law.343.73096Bleyen Liefauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1062451MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910255195803321Judicial Sales of Ships2525705UNINA