03923nam 2200721 450 991082491320332120230803220652.01-61451-041-510.1515/9781614510413(CKB)2550000001169783(EBL)990691(SSID)ssj0001124095(PQKBManifestationID)11727585(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001124095(PQKBWorkID)11084742(PQKB)11329441(MiAaPQ)EBC990691(DE-B1597)174134(OCoLC)948655555(OCoLC)979688042(DE-B1597)9781614510413(Au-PeEL)EBL990691(CaPaEBR)ebr10819867(CaONFJC)MIL551768(OCoLC)865329749(EXLCZ)99255000000116978320140107h20142014 uy| 0engur|||||||||||txtccrStrengthening the PRO hypothesis /Lisa A. ReedBoston :De Gruyter Mouton,[2014]©20141 online resource (396 p.)Studies in generative grammar,0167-4331 ;volume 110Description based upon print version of record.1-61451-042-3 1-306-20517-4 Includes bibliographical references and index. Frontmatter -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- Chapter 1. Overview -- Chapter 2. On the historical development of PRO approaches to Control -- Chapter 3. Movement and implicit argument approaches to Control -- Chapter 4. A critical look at some standard arguments in favor of PRO -- Chapter 5. Remotivating a PRO approach to Control -- Chapter 6. The syntax of Control -- Chapter 7. On the reference of PRO -- Chapter 8. On an unexpected gap in the distribution of PRO -- Chapter 9. Conclusions -- Bibliography -- IndexThe syntax of Control structures remains a topic of heated debate: Standard generative treatments continue to analyze them in terms of PRO, a hypothesis challenged in alternative syntactic frameworks, semantic circles, and even within the generative tradition itself. This book: (a) examines empirical paradigms currently assumed to favor a PRO approach over competing theories, demonstrating that alternative approaches offer equally plausible treatments of these facts; (b) develops five novel arguments amenable to analysis only within a PRO approach; (c) puts forth a radically revised PRO approach to Control according to which PRO continues to be analyzed as a non-expletive nominal, but one lacking phi- and Case features in the computational component. Contra standard theory, PRO is argued to never undergo movement to a position even as high as the first NegP that dominates its initial merge position. Furthermore, Control complements are shown to take the form of such diverse categories as CP, IP, vP and VP; and (d) considers how a syntactically phi-featureless noun comes to be understood to bear phi-features, as well as how tense limits PRO's distribution in a here-to-fore unnoticed fashion. Studies in generative grammar ;110.Control (Linguistics)Grammar, Comparative and generalInfinitival constructionsGrammar, Comparative and generalControl Theory.Generative Grammar.Semantics.Syntax.Control (Linguistics)Grammar, Comparative and generalInfinitival constructions.Grammar, Comparative and general.415Reed Lisa A1711456MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910824913203321Strengthening the PRO hypothesis4102759UNINA01191nam2 2200265 i 450 VAN006864320180316112226.34320090403d2005 |0itac50 baitaIT|||| |||||ˆ2: ‰Probabilità e statisticaCosimo VitaleNapoliEdizioni scientifiche italiane2005X, 302 p.24 cm.001VAN00686422001 Introduzione alla statistica per le applicazioni economicheCosimo Vitale210 Napoli [etc.]Edizioni scientifiche italiane215 v.24 cm.2Statistica e informatica applicata all'economia e alla statisticaVANC029781SGNapoliVANL000005VitaleCosimoVANV0348581609ESI <editore>VANV108662650ITSOL20240329RICABIBLIOTECA DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE POLITICHE JEAN MONNETIT-CE0182VAN04VAN0068643BIBLIOTECA DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE POLITICHE JEAN MONNET04CONS V.C.b.4 04OMA11 20090403 Probabilità e statistica931741UNICAMPANIA