01161nam0 22002771i 450 SUN001216120111024120607.8588-324-5295-220070314d2005 |0itac50 baitaIT|||| |||||Controllo di gestioneaspetti contabili, tecnico-operativi e gestionaliMaria Silvia Avia cura di Bruno FrizzeraTrento : il Sole 24 ore2005272 p. : 30 cmIn cop.: Costi per le decisioni, analisi redittuale di prodotto, Break Even Point, contabilità analitica.TrentoSUNL000081Avi, Maria SilviaSUNV021459115950Frizzera, BrunoSUNV038852Il sole 24 oreSUNV001053650ITSOL20181109RICASUN0012161UFFICIO DI BIBLIOTECA DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI ECONOMIA03 CONS 7811/II BM 03 7811 UFFICIO DI BIBLIOTECA DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI ECONOMIAIT-CE01067811CONS 7811/II BMcaControllo di gestione710536UNICAMPANIA05529nam 2200697Ia 450 991014061280332120170815113041.01-282-49192-X97866124919240-470-68833-50-470-68832-7(CKB)2670000000013697(EBL)496048(OCoLC)609858694(SSID)ssj0000361528(PQKBManifestationID)11242438(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000361528(PQKBWorkID)10351373(PQKB)10536335(MiAaPQ)EBC496048(EXLCZ)99267000000001369720100104d2010 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrImproving survey response[electronic resource] lessons learned from the European Social Survey /Ineke Stoop ... [et al.]Chichester, West Sussex ;Hoboken, NJ Wiley20101 online resource (346 p.)Wiley series in survey methodologyDescription based upon print version of record.0-470-51669-0 Includes bibliographical references and index.Improving Survey Response: Lessons learned from the European Social Survey; Contents; Preface and Acknowledgements; List of Countries; 1 Backgrounds of Nonresponse; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Declining Response Rates; 1.3 Total Survey Quality and Nonresponse; 1.4 Optimizing Comparability; 2 Survey Response in Cross-national Studies; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Harmonization Models; 2.3 Contactability; 2.4 Ability to Cooperate; 2.5 Willingness to Cooperate; 2.5.1 Social environment and survey culture; 2.5.2 Households and individuals; 2.5.3 Survey design; 2.5.4 Interviewers2.5.5 Interviewer-respondent interaction: why people cooperate2.6 Nonresponse Bias; 2.6.1 What is nonresponse bias?; 2.6.2 Combating and adjusting for nonresponse bias; 2.7 Ethics and Humans; 3 The European Social Survey; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 What is the European Social Survey?; 3.2.1 Aims, history and philosophy; 3.2.2 Content; 3.2.3 Participating countries; 3.2.4 Organization and structure; 3.3 ESS Design and Methodology; 3.3.1 The central specification; 3.3.2 Quality and optimal comparability; 3.3.3 Sampling designs, procedures and definitions of the population3.3.4 Fieldwork and contracting3.4 Nonresponse Targets, Strategies and Documentation; 3.4.1 Background; 3.4.2 Requirements and guidelines; 3.4.3 Definition and calculation of response rates; 3.4.4 Contact forms; 3.5 Conclusions; Appendix 3.1 A Contact Form as Used in ESS 3; 4 Implementation of the European Social Survey; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Basic Survey Features; 4.2.1 Survey organization, administration mode and sample; 4.2.2 Sample size, number of interviewers and length of fieldwork period; 4.2.3 Survey costs; 4.3 Practical Fieldwork Issues; 4.3.1 Interviewers4.3.2 Information and incentives4.4 Summary and Conclusions; 5 Response and Nonresponse Rates in the European Social Survey; 5.1 Data and Definitions; 5.2 Response and Nonresponse Rates in ESS 3; 5.2.1 Rate of ineligibles; 5.2.2 Response rate; 5.2.3 Structure of nonresponse; 5.3 Response Rate Changes Over Time; 5.3.1 Overview; 5.3.2 Response rate trends for specific countries; 5.4 Response Rate Differences and Fieldwork Efforts; 5.4.1 Response rate differences across countries and fieldwork efforts; 5.4.2 Change in response rates over time and change in fieldwork efforts6 Response Enhancement Through Extended Interviewer Efforts6.1 Introduction; 6.2 Previous Research on Contactability; 6.2.1 Factors in establishing contact; 6.2.2 Who is hard to contact?; 6.2.3 Call patterns and strategies; 6.3 Previous Research on Cooperation; 6.3.1 Covariates of cooperation; 6.3.2 Causes of cooperation and noncooperation; 6.3.3 Attitudes towards surveys and reasons for refusal; 6.4 Sample Type and Recruitment Mode in the ESS; 6.4.1 Sampling issues; 6.4.2 Recruitment mode; 6.5 Establishing Contact in the ESS; 6.5.1 Introduction; 6.5.2 Noncontact rates6.5.3 Ease of contact and number of callsHigh response rates have traditionally been considered as one of the main indicators of survey quality. Obtaining high response rates is sometimes difficult and expensive, but clearly plays a beneficial role in terms of improving data quality. It is becoming increasingly clear, however, that simply boosting response to achieve a higher response rate will not in itself eradicate nonresponse bias. In this book the authors argue that high response rates should not be seen as a goal in themselves, but rather as part of an overall survey quality strategy based on random probability sampling and aimWiley series in survey methodology.Social surveysResponse rateSocial surveysResponse rateEuropePublic opinion pollsPublic opinionEuropeElectronic books.Social surveysResponse rate.Social surveysResponse ratePublic opinion polls.Public opinion001.4301.072/3Stoop Ineke A. L895484MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910140612803321Improving survey response2000450UNINA01371nam 2200385 n 450 99638402330331620221108094944.0(CKB)1000000000585809(EEBO)2248515604(UnM)99859128(EXLCZ)99100000000058580919850319d1650 uy |engurbn||||a|bb|Arguments and reasons to prove the inconvenience & unlawfulness of taking the new engagement[electronic resource] modestly propounded to all persons concerned[London s.n.1650]8 pReproduction of original in Cambridge University Library.Caption title.Attributed to John Aucher. cf. NUC pre-1956.Imprint taken from NUC pre-1956.eebo-0018Loyalty oathsGreat Britain17th centuryGreat BritainPolitics and government1649-1660Great BritainHistoryPuritan Revolution, 1642-1660Loyalty oathsAucher John1619-1701.1003885Cu-RivESCu-RivESCStRLINWaOLNBOOK996384023303316Arguments and reasons to prove the inconvenience & unlawfulness of taking the new engagement2305330UNISA02991nam 22005655 450 99649656470331620221107062033.03-8394-6327-010.1515/9783839463277(CKB)5590000000999879(DE-B1597)625560(DE-B1597)9783839463277(OCoLC)1349351510(MiAaPQ)EBC30469260(Au-PeEL)EBL30469260(EXLCZ)99559000000099987920221107h20222022 fg gerur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierDisziplinierung durch Methode Zur Bedeutung der Methodenlehre für das Fach Soziologie /Lisa Kressin1st ed.Bielefeld : transcript Verlag, [2022]©20221 online resource (392 p.)Science StudiesFrontmatter -- Inhalt -- Abbildungen -- Tabellen -- 1. Einleitung -- Theorie -- 2. Kultur wissenschaftlich betrachtet -- 3. Wissenschaft kulturell betrachtet -- Gegenstand -- 4. Soziologien lehren -- 5. Methode und Disziplin -- Empirie -- 6. Methodenkapitel -- 7. Wenn Soziolog:innen Soziologie deuten -- 8. Wenn Soziolog:innen andere deuten, die Soziologie deuten -- 9. Soziologie gemeinsam deuten -- 10. Soziologie verschieden deuten -- 11. Sociologist in the making -- A. Anhang -- Literatur -- DanksagungSelbst- und Fremdbeschreibungen der Soziologie sind stark von der symbolischen Differenzierung entlang kultureller Grenzen geprägt. Als Wissenskultur zwischen den »harten« Natur- und den »weichen« Geisteswissenschaften muss sie interdisziplinäre Anschlussfähigkeit und zugleich Distinktion vermitteln. Um der Gesellschaft die Gesellschaft zu erklären, muss sie verständlich sein und doch die spezifische Sprache der Wissenschaft nutzen. Lisa Kressin zeichnet die Bedeutung der Methodenlehre im Soziologiestudium für die Reproduktion dieser Spannungen nach und weist ihr eine Schlüsselrolle in der Etablierung der kulturellen Einheit und Differenz dieser wissenschaftlichen Disziplin zu.Science StudiesSOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / GeneralbisacshCourses.Knowledge.Methodology.Qualitative Social Research.Science.Sociology of Science.Sociology.Teaching.SOCIAL SCIENCE / Sociology / General.AK 26600DE-Ofb1/22rvkKressin Lisa, authttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1264608Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)fndhttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/fndDE-B1597DE-B1597BOOK996496564703316Disziplinierung durch Methode2965536UNISA