01039nam0 2200277 i 450 SUN000342220101027120000.020020711d1987 |0itac50 baitaIT|||| |||||Valenze medico-legali oggiAchille Cittadini, Goffredo SciaudoneNapoliMartinucci1987565 p.25 cm.Medicina legaleFISUNC002348NapoliSUNL000005614.1921Cittadini, AchilleSUNV003374226242Sciaudone, GoffredoSUNV003375225543MartinucciSUNV003200650ITSOL20181109RICASUN0003422UFFICIO DI BIBLIOTECA DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI GIURISPRUDENZA00 CONS II.D.5 00 14481 UFFICIO DI BIBLIOTECA DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI GIURISPRUDENZA14481CONS II.D.5paValenze medico-legali oggi1439191UNICAMPANIA03069nam 2200697 a 450 991046128430332120200520144314.01-299-20106-70-7083-2417-7(CKB)2670000000136599(EBL)819821(OCoLC)768123159(SSID)ssj0000812921(PQKBManifestationID)12417928(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000812921(PQKBWorkID)10865869(PQKB)10831257(SSID)ssj0000743627(PQKBManifestationID)12284830(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000743627(PQKBWorkID)10828208(PQKB)11087627(MiAaPQ)EBC819821(Au-PeEL)EBL819821(CaPaEBR)ebr10640635(CaONFJC)MIL451356(EXLCZ)99267000000013659920130108d2011 uy 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrMemories of May '68[electronic resource] France's convenient consensus /Chris ReynoldsCardiff University of Wales Press20111 online resource (200 p.)French and francophone studiesDescription based upon print version of record.0-7083-2415-0 0-7083-2416-9 Includes bibliographical references and index.Series Editors' Preface; Dedication; Acknowledgements; Introduction; The emergence of a convenient consensus; 1968: consensus and disagreement; Current attitudes to the events of 1968; May/June 1968 and the French university system; 2008 - 'Liquidate', consolidate and innovate; Appendix; Notes; Bibliography; IndexFor over forty years now, 1968 in France has been the focus of much attention. While mai 68 is certainly seen as a watershed in the development of French society, a common narrative that portrays it in an increasingly reductive light has become prevalent. As a result, the French collective memory of 1968 has been shaped and cultivated in such a way that undermines true magnitude of the 'events'. Why this is the case, who benefits from the dominance of this consensus and to what extent the history of 1968 is retrievable are the questions that underpin Memories of mai 68: France's Convenient ConFrench and francophone studies.Protest movementsFranceHistory20th centuryStudent movementsFranceHistory20th centuryYouthPolitical activityFranceHistory20th centuryElectronic books.Protest movementsHistoryStudent movementsHistoryYouthPolitical activityHistory306.09944.0836Reynolds Chris857216MiAaPQMiAaPQMiAaPQBOOK9910461284303321Memories of May '681914154UNINA03368nam 22006615 450 991048488270332120250423080152.03-662-44293-010.1007/978-3-662-44293-7(CKB)3710000000239376(EBL)1966031(OCoLC)908084640(SSID)ssj0001354176(PQKBManifestationID)11768820(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001354176(PQKBWorkID)11322680(PQKB)11428336(DE-He213)978-3-662-44293-7(MiAaPQ)EBC1966031(PPN)181348322(EXLCZ)99371000000023937620140911d2015 u| 0engur|n|---|||||txtccrJudges Against Justice On Judges When the Rule of Law is Under Attack /by Hans Petter Graver1st ed. 2015.Berlin, Heidelberg :Springer Berlin Heidelberg :Imprint: Springer,2015.1 online resource (297 p.)Description based upon print version of record.3-662-44292-2 Includes bibliographical references.The Judicial Role and the Rule of Law -- Part One: The War of Law: State Repression and the Rule of Law -- Repression of the Judiciary -- Judicial Acceptance of Oppression -- The Opposition -- Part Two: Holding Judges Responsible for Injustice: The Argument for Criminal Liability -- The Condition of Illegality under International Law -- The condition of Illegality and Failed Usurpations -- The Condition of Illegality in Transitional Settings -- Judges in Special Courts -- Justification of Judicial Oppression -- A Special Immunity for Judges? -- Holding Judges Responsible -- Part Three: The Moral Side of Judging: The Positivism Thesis -- What Positivism? -- Alternative approaches to Legal Interpretation -- Beyond Legal Theory as Explanation -- The Lesser Evil -- Judges for Justice.This book explores concrete situations in which judges are faced with a legislature and an executive that consciously and systematically discard the ideals of the rule of law. It revolves around three basic questions: What happens when states become oppressive and the judiciary contributes to the oppression? How can we, from a legal point of view, evaluate the actions of judges who contribute to oppression? And, thirdly, how can we understand their participation from a moral point of view and support their inclination to resist?LawLawPhilosophyLawHistoryInternational criminal lawFundamentals of LawTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal HistoryInternational Criminal LawLaw.LawPhilosophy.LawHistory.International criminal law.Fundamentals of Law.Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.International Criminal Law.340340.1345Graver Hans Petterauthttp://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut532180BOOK9910484882703321Judges Against Justice2853956UNINA