01695nam1 2200445 450 00001345920141211102354.020030519d--------km-y0itay0103----bagrcengUSGBSophoclesin two volumeswith an English translation by F. Storr.Cambridge, MassachusettsHarvard University PressLondon<<William>> Heinemann2 volumi17 cm<<The>> Loeb classical libraryTraduzione inglese con testo greco a fronte2001<<The>> Loeb classical library0010000134612001 Oedipus the king, Oedipus at Colonus, Antigone0010000134622001 Ajax, Electra, Trachiniae, PhiloctetesTragoediae / Sophocles882.01(22. ed.)Dramma e poesia drammatica in greco classico. Origini-500Sophocles<5. saec. a.C.>386422Storr,FrancisITUniversità della Basilicata - B.I.A.REICATunimarc000013459Tragoediae16927UNIBASSTD0220120030519BAS011047STD0220120030522BAS01104620050601BAS011755batch0120050718BAS01105120050718BAS01111120050718BAS01114120050718BAS011155EXT0130120141105BAS011537EXT0130120141105BAS011558EXT0130120141105BAS011627ATR4020141112BAS010914ATR0020141211BAS011023EXT0130120141211BAS01102301427nam--2200421---450-99000206365020331620100409102116.0978-88-426-6634-9000206365USA01000206365(ALEPH)000206365USA0100020636520041008d2009----km-y0itay50------baitagerITy|||||||001yyDeutsche Grammatikgrammatica di riferimento per lo studio della lingua tedescaElena Bruno, Raffaela Franchconsulenza linguistica di Annelie MaidhofEd. aggiornataTorinoIl capitello2009XII, 452 p.23 cm1 fasc. (78 p.)Titolo del fascicolo: Chiavi per l'insegnanteLingua tedescaGrammaticaBNCF435BRUNO,Elena<1953- >567040FRANCH,Raffaela412326MAIDHOF,AnnelieITsalbcISBD990002063650203316VII.2.D. 357223217 L.M.VII.2.D.00257184VII.2.D. 357 a223218 L.M.VII.2.D.00257185BKUMAACQUISTI1020041008USA011401ACQUISTI1020041210USA010955ANNAMARIA9020100409USA011020ANNAMARIA9020100409USA011021Deutsche Grammatik1043696UNISA02393nam 2200517I 450 991071287040332120200124112932.0(CKB)5470000002497477(OCoLC)1137377515(EXLCZ)99547000000249747720200124j198011 ua 0engur|||||||||||txtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierA summary and analysis of comments received in response to the EPA/NHTSA information request regarding the effects of test procedure changes on fuel economy /by James Hourihane, Glenn D. Thompson and Edward LeBaron[Ann Arbor, Mich.] :Standards Development and Support Branch, Emission Control Technology Division, Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control, Office of Air, Noise and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,November 1980.1 online resource (approximately 213 pages) illustrations, map"EPA-AA-SDSB 81-8.""November 1980."Includes bibliographical references.Summary and analysis of comments received in response to the Environmental Protection Agency/National Highway Traffic Safety Administration information request regarding the effects of test procedure changes on fuel economyAutomobilesMotorsExhaust gasAutomobilesFuel consumptionAir qualityStandardsUnited StatesDynamometerRoad loadsMotor vehicle industryAutomobilesMotorsExhaust gas.AutomobilesFuel consumption.Air qualityStandardsDynamometer.Road loads.Motor vehicle industry.Hourihane James1389650Thompson Glenn D.LeBaron EdwardUnited States.Environmental Protection Agency.Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control.Emission Control Technology Division.Standards Development and Support Branch,United States.National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.GPOGPOBOOK9910712870403321A summary and analysis of comments received in response to the EPA3441501UNINA04283nam 2200529z- 450 991026113500332120210212(CKB)4100000002484742(oapen)https://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/58037(oapen)doab58037(EXLCZ)99410000000248474220202102d2017 |y 0engurmn|---annantxtrdacontentcrdamediacrrdacarrierRegulation of Endurance Performance: New FrontiersFrontiers Media SA20171 online resource (246 p.)Frontiers Research Topics2-88945-329-4 Successful endurance performance requires the integration of multiple physiological and psychological systems, working together to regulate exercise intensity in a way that will reduce time taken or increase work done. The systems that ultimately limit performance of the task are hotly contested, and may depend on a variety of factors including the type of task, the environment, external influences, training status of the individual and a host of psychological constructs. These factors can be studied in isolation, or inclusively as a whole-body or integrative system. A reductionist approach has traditionally been favoured, leading to a greater understanding and emphasis on muscle and cardiovascular physiology, but the role of the brain and how this integrates multiple systems is gaining momentum. However, these differing approaches may have led to false dichotomy, and now with better understanding of both fields, there is a need to bring these perspectives together. The divergent viewpoints of the limitations to human performance may have partly arisen because of the different exercise models studied. These can broadly be defined as open loop (where a fixed intensity is maintained until task disengagement), or closed loop (where a fixed distance is completed in the fastest time), which may involve whole-body or single-limb exercise. Closed loop exercise allows an analysis of how exercise intensity is self-regulated (i.e. pacing), and thus may better reflect the demands of competitive endurance performance. However, whilst this model can monitor changes in pacing, this is often at the expense of detecting subtle differences in the measured physiological or psychological variables of interest. Open loop exercise solves this issue, but is limited by its more restrictive exercise model. Nonetheless, much can be learnt from both experimental approaches when these constraints are recognised. Indeed, both models appear equally effective in examining changes in performance, and so the researcher should select the exercise model which can most appropriately test the study hypothesis. Given that a multitude of both internal (e.g. muscle fatigue, perception of effort, dietary intervention, pain etc.) and external (e.g. opponents, crowd presence, course topography, extrinsic reward etc.) factors likely contribute to exercise regulation and endurance performance, it may be that both models are required to gain a comprehensive understanding. Consequently, this research topic seeks to bring together papers on endurance performance from a variety of paradigms and exercise models, with the overarching aim of comparing, examining and integrating their findings to better understand how exercise is regulated and how this may (or may not) limit performance.Regulation of Endurance PerformancePhysiologybicsscBrainCyclingExerciseFatigueMusclePacingPerformanceRunningTrainingTriathlonPhysiologyHollie S. Jonesauth1292328Corbett JoauthAlexis R. MaugerauthAndrew RenfreeauthFlorentina J. HettingaauthBenjamin PageauxauthDominic P. MicklewrightauthBOOK9910261135003321Regulation of Endurance Performance: New Frontiers3022177UNINA