1.

Record Nr.

UNISALENTO991002869999707536

Autore

Andrisani, Gaetano

Titolo

Maria Mirela

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Marcianise : La Diana, 2003

Descrizione fisica

181p. ; 18cm

Disciplina

853.914

Lingua di pubblicazione

Italiano

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910826761803321

Autore

Matava Robert Joseph

Titolo

Divine causality and human free choice : Domingo Báñez, physical premotion, and the controversy de Auxiliis revisited / / Robert Joseph Matava

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Leiden, Netherlands ; ; Boston, Massachusetts : , : Brill, , 2016

©2016

ISBN

90-04-31031-2

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (377 p.)

Collana

Brill's Studies in Intellectual History, , 0920-8607 ; ; Volume 252

Disciplina

233/.7

Soggetti

Free will and determinism - Religious aspects - Catholic Church

Molinism

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Preliminary Material / R.J. Matava -- Prologue / R.J. Matava -- 1 An Historical Introduction to the Controversy de Auxiliis / R.J. Matava -- 2 Domingo Báñez on Divine Causality and Human Free Choice / R.J. Matava -- 3 Domingo Báñez’s Critique of Molina / R.J. Matava -- 4 Luis de Molina’s Critique of Báñez / R.J. Matava -- 5 Physical Premotion or



Aristotelian Premotion? The Proposal of Bernard Lonergan / R.J. Matava -- 6 Creation, Causal Priority and Human Freedom: Revisiting Thomas Aquinas / R.J. Matava -- 7 God Creates Human Free Choices: An Explanation and Defense / R.J. Matava -- Epilogue / R.J. Matava -- Select Bibliography / R.J. Matava -- Index / R.J. Matava.

Sommario/riassunto

In Divine Causality and Human Free Choice , R.J. Matava explains the idea of physical premotion defended by Domingo Báñez, whose position in the Controversy de Auxiliis has been typically ignored in contemporary discussions of providence and freewill. Through a close engagement with untranslated primary texts, Matava shows Báñez’s relevance to recent debates about middle knowledge. Finding the mutual critiques of Báñez and Molina convincing, Matava argues that common presuppositions led both parties into an insoluble dilemma. However, Matava also challenges the informal consensus that Lonergan definitively resolved the controversy. Developing a position independently advanced by several recent scholars, Matava explains how the doctrine of creation entails a position that is more satisfactory both philosophically and as a reading of Aquinas.