| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA996466732103316 |
|
|
Autore |
Ryzhov Vladimir |
|
|
Titolo |
Modeling and simulation of complex dynamical systems : virtual laboratory approach based on Wolfram system modeler / / Vladimir Ryzhov [and five others] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Singapore : , : Springer, , [2021] |
|
©2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (182 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Dynamics - Computer simulation |
Dynamics - Mathematical models |
Mechanics - Computer simulation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910797624403321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Characterisation in Apuleius' Metamorphoses : nine studies / / edited by Stephen Harrison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Newcastle upon Tyne, England : , : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, , 2015 |
|
©2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (208 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classificazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Characters and characteristics in literature |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references and indexes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This is the first volume dedicated to the topic of characterisation in Apuleius' Metamorphoses, the Latin novel from the second century CE. The subject has not been ignored in recent scholarship on individual characters in the work, but the lack of an earlier general overview of the topic reflects the general history of scholarship on the Metamorphoses. Literature on Apuleius' novel until the 1960's centred around the issue of his general literary quality, and some key scholars held distinctly low estimates of Apuleius' talents. Since 1970, most critics have seen Apuleius as a conscious and eff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |