| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910135159903321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Rapid System Prototyping (RSP), 2014 25th IEEE International Symposium on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA996395297003316 |
|
|
Titolo |
His Majesties most gracious speech to both Houses of Parliament, on Thursday the second of October, 1690 [[electronic resource] ] : Together with the proceedings of Parliament |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Dublin, : Reprinted by Andrew Crook, assignee of Benjamin Tooke, printer to the King and Queens most excellent Majesties, on Ormonde-Key, 1690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
William, King of England, <1650-1702.> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Great Britain History William and Mary, 1689-1702 Early works to 1800 |
Ireland History War of 1689-1691 Early works to 1800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Imperfect: page 2 not filmed [blank?]. |
Reproduction of original in the British Library. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910971463103321 |
|
|
Autore |
Grindle Merilee <1945-> |
|
|
Titolo |
Audacious reforms : institutional invention and democracy in Latin America / / Merilee S. Grindle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Baltimore, : Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xiv, 269 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Local elections - Latin America |
Decentralization in government - Latin America |
Central-local government relations - Latin America |
Democracy - Latin America |
Political participation - Latin America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [245]-262) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1. Audacious reforms : democratizing Latin America -- 2. Explaining the unexpected -- 3. Institutional invention in Venezuela : legitimizing the system -- 4. New rules of the game : consequences of change in Venezuela -- 5. Political engineering in Bolivia : the law for popular participation -- 6. A new conundrum : national-local politics in Bolivia -- 7. Pacting institutional change in Argentina -- 8. Waiting for Godot? constitutional change in Argentine practice -- 9. Democratizing reforms : origins and consequences. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Audacious Reforms examines the creation of new political institutions in three Latin American countries: direct elections for governors and mayors in Venezuela, radical municipalization in Bolivia, and direct election of the mayor of Buenos Aires in Argentina. Diverging from the usual incremental processes of political change, these cases marked a significant departure from traditional centralized governments. Such "audacious reforms," explains Merilee S. Grindle, reinvent the ways in which public problems are manifested and resolved, the ways in which political actors calculate the costs and benefits of their activities, and the ways in which social groups relate to the political process. Grindle considers three central questions: Why would rational politicians |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
choose to give up power? What accounts for the selection of some institutions rather than others? And how does the introduction of new institutions alter the nature of political actions? The case studies of Venezuela, Bolivia, and Argentina demonstrate that institutional invention must be understood from theoretical perspectives that stretch beyond immediate concerns about electoral gains and political support building. Broader theoretical perspectives on the definition of nation and state, the nature of political contests, the legitimacy of political systems, and the role of elites all must be considered. While past conflicts are not erased by reforms, in the new order there is often greater potential for more responsible, accountable, and democratic government. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |