| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA996384039903316 |
|
|
Autore |
Breton Nicholas <1545?-1626?> |
|
|
Titolo |
Olde mad-cappes new gally-mawfrey [[electronic resource] ] : Made into a merrie messe of minglemangle, out of these three idle-conceited humours following. 1 I will not. 2 Oh, the merrie time. 3 Out vpon money |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
At London, : Printed [by W. White] for Richard Iohnes, neere St. Andrewes Church in Holborne, 1602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Dedication signed: Nich. Breton. |
Printer's name from STC. |
Signatures: A² B-EⴠF² . |
Running title reads: Olde mad-caps new gally-mawfrey. |
Some quires have vertical chain lines. |
Reproduction of the original in the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910787016203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Caimi Mario |
|
|
Titolo |
Kant's B. Deduction / / by Mario Caimi |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Newcastle upon Tyne, England : , : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, , 2014 |
|
©2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (154 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Representation (Philosophy) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS; PREFACE [TO THE FRENCH EDITION]; FOREWORD; ABBREVIATIONS; INTRODUCTION; CHAPTER ONE; CHAPTER TWO; CHAPTER THREE; CONCLUSIONS; BIBLIOGRAPHY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book is organized as a commentary following the text of the B-Transcendental Deduction line by line. In so doing, it becomes evident that each step of the Deduction necessarily follows from the preceding step and is grounded in it, although not in the way the steps of a formal-logic deduction are. The primary hypothesis of this book is that the succession of steps is but the unfolding of the Principle of Apperception. The commentary assumes that the entire argument of the B-Deduction con... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |