|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA996344234403316 |
|
|
Autore |
Philipp Marc P |
|
|
Titolo |
Intellectual property related generic defense strategies in the European pharmaceutical market : implications of the EU Commission's sector inquiry from an IP, competition law and economic perspective / / Marc P. Philipp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 electronic resource (92 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Drugs - Law and legislation - European Union countries |
Drugs |
Generic drugs - European Union countries |
Antitrust law - European Union countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
"Munich Intellectual Property Law Center." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. 83-91). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- Governance framework of Europe's pharmaceutical sector -- Competitive dynamics in Europe's pharmaceutical market -- Potential future limitations for generic defense -- Implications of business model transformations -- Conclusion & managerial recommendation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book discusses the implications of the 2009 EU Commission’s Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry on originator’s opportunities to apply Intellectual Property related measures in defending against generic competition. It argues that on the one hand recent developments in EU competition law do indeed impose potential limitations on an originator’s ability to block or delay generic market entry. On the other hand, the book calls for a differentiated assessment of the rather broad allegations made by the sector inquiry. The book thereby presents and thoroughly analyzes six key issues identified by the EU Commission in the inquiry’s final report: Blocking/defensive patenting, patent thickets, patent-related disputes and litigation, follow-on innovation, authorized generic entries and patent settlement agreements as well as interventions into generic marketing authorization. The analysis aims at |
|
|
|
|