1.

Record Nr.

UNISA996320163003316

Autore

Johnson Barbara <1947-2009.>

Titolo

Moses and multiculturalism [[electronic resource] /] / Barbara Johnson ; foreword by Barbara Rietveld

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Berkeley, : University of California Press, c2010

ISBN

1-282-76398-9

9786612763984

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (127 p.)

Collana

Flashpoints ; ; 2

Classificazione

11.41

Disciplina

222/.1092

Soggetti

Multiculturalism

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references (p. 97-104) and index.

Nota di contenuto

Front matter -- Contents -- Foreword -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. The Biblical Moses -- Chapter 2. Moses and the Law -- Chapter 3. Flavius Josephus -- Chapter 4. Frances E. W. Harper -- Chapter 5. Moses, the Egyptian -- Chapter 6. Freud's Moses -- Chapter 7. Hurston's Moses -- Chapter 8. The German Moses -- Chapter 9. Moses, the Movie -- Epilogue -- Notes -- Index

Sommario/riassunto

Countering impressions of Moses reinforced by Sigmund Freud in his epoch-making Moses and Monotheism, this concise, engaging work begins with the perception that the story of Moses is at once the most nationalist and the most multicultural of all foundation narratives. Weaving together various texts-biblical passages, philosophy, poems, novels, opera, and movies-Barbara Johnson explores how the story of Moses has been appropriated, reimagined, and transmitted across cultures and historical moments. But she finds that already in the Bible, the story of Moses is a multicultural story, the story of someone who functions well in a world to which he, unbeknownst to the casual observer, does not belong. Using the Moses story as a lens through which to view questions at the heart of contemporary literary, philosophical, and ethical debates, Johnson shows how, through a close analysis of this figure's recurrence through time, we might understand something of the paradoxes, if not the impasses of contemporary multiculturalism.