| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNISA996308809003316 |
|
|
Autore |
Helms Dietrich |
|
|
Titolo |
Keiner wird gewinnen : Populäre Musik im Wettbewerb / Dietrich Helms, Thomas Phleps (verst.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Bielefeld, : transcript Verlag, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Beiträge zur Popularmusikforschung ; 33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classificazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Musik; Wettbewerb; Eurovision Song Contest; Deutschland Sucht den Superstar; Popstars; Popkultur; Popmusik; Musikwissenschaft; Music; Popular Culture; Pop Music; Musicology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter 1 INHALT 5 EDITORIAL 7 VON MARSYAS BIS KÜBLBÖCK. EINE KLEINE GESCHICHTE UND THEORIE MUSIKALISCHER WETTKÄMPFE 11 » UND NUN AN DIE FRONT, DEUTSCHE KAPELLEN, DEUTSCHE MUSIKER!« INFORMATIONEN UND ÜBERLEGUNGEN ZU WETTBEWERBEN IN DER POPULÄREN MUSIKSZENE AUS DER ZEIT VOR DEM 2. WELTKRIEG 41 »MACHTS EIN EIGENES LAGERLIED« - LIEDWETTBEWERBE IM KZ 57 DAS TV-FESTIVAL ALS BÜHNE DES PROTESTS UND DER INNOVATION. DIE BRASILIANISCHEN MUSIKFESTIVALS 1965-1972 83 MUSIKWETTBEWERB VS. WETTBEWERBSMUSIK - DAS DILEMMA DES EUROVISION SONG CONTESTS 101 KEINER DARF GEWINNEN - POTENZIALE EINER EFFEKTIVEN MEDIENKRITIK NEUER TV-CASTINGSHOWS 113 HIT-RECYCLING: CASTING-SHOWS UND DIE WETTBEWERBSSTRATEGIE »COVERVERSION« 137 DER GUTE TON, ODER: DIE FUNKTION DANIEL KÜBLBÖCKS IM STAR-SYSTEM VON DEUTSCHLAND SUCHT DEN SUPERSTAR UND IM ÖFFENTLICHEN DISKURS 151 MUSIKSTARS IN DER WAHRNEHMUNG JUGENDLICHER TV-CASTINGSHOW-REZIPIENTEN. EINE EMPIRISCHE UNTERSUCHUNG 163 DIE WERTUNGSKRITERIEN DER DEUTSCHLAND SUCHT DEN SUPERSTAR-JURY VOR DEM HINTERGRUND SOZIALER MILIEUS UND KULTURINDUSTRIELLER STRATEGIEN 187 ZU DEN AUTOREN 209 Backmatter 212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Deutschland sucht: den Superstar, Popstars oder auch den |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finalteilnehmer für den Eurovision Song Contest. Musikalische Wettbewerbe in der populären Musik fesseln ein Millionenpublikum. Obwohl in der Vergangenheit Wettbewerbe oft entscheidend für die Weiterentwicklung der populären Musik wie auch der Kunstmusik waren, haben sich weder Musik- noch Kulturwissenschaften bisher ausführlich mit dem Thema auseinander gesetzt. Der Band untersucht Wettbewerbe, die aktuell Schlagzeilen machen, knüpft jedoch auch Verbindungen zur Geschichte dieser Form und zu vergleichbaren Events in anderen Kulturen. |
»›A star is born‹ hieß es einst, schreiben die Herausgeber im Editorial, doch dies droht in der Popmusik immer mehr von ›A star is made‹ abgelöst zu werden. Die Rede ist von Formaten wie ›Deutschland sucht den Superstar‹, denen renommierte Musikwissenschaftler nun ein erstes Buch gewidmet haben.« Martin Büsser, testcard, Þ15 »Insgesamt eröffnet der Band den Blick auf ein interessantes Themenfeld [...].« Matthias Euteneuer, Ivonne Küsters, Soziologische Revue, 4 (2008) Besprochen in: FORUM MUSIKBIBLIOTHEK, 4 (2005), Michael Stapper www.netzmagazin.ch, 12 (2005), Stephan Sigg Jahrbuch des Deutschen Volksliedarchivs, 52 (2007), Sabine Vogt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910160352203321 |
|
|
Titolo |
A data-based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States / / Committee on an Assessment of Research Doctorate Programs ; Jeremiah P. Ostriker, Charlotte V. Kuh, and James A. Voytuk, Paul W. Holland, editors ; Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council of the National Academies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Washington, D.C., : National Academies Press, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
0-309-22479-9 |
0-309-45460-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (xvii, 304 p.) : ill. ; + 1 CD-ROM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
National Research Council (U. S.) |
OstrikerJ. P |
KuhCharlotte V |
VoytukJames A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Universities and colleges - Study and teaching (Graduate) - United States - Evaluation |
Research - United States - Evaluation |
Doctor of philosophy degree - United States - Evaluation |
Science - Study and teaching (Graduate) - United States - Evaluation |
Humanities - Study and teaching (Graduate) - United States - Evaluation |
Engineering - Study and teaching (Graduate) - United States - Evaluation |
Social sciences - Study and teaching (Graduate) - United States - Evaluation |
Doctor of philosophy degree - Evaluation - United States |
Universities and colleges - Graduate work - Evaluation - United States |
Universities and colleges - Ratings and rankings - United States |
Research - Evaluation - United States |
Educational surveys - United States |
Schools |
Education |
Financial Support |
Health Care Evaluation Mechanisms |
Investigative Techniques |
Education, Professional |
Quality of Health Care |
Economics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation |
Health Care Economics and Organizations |
Delivery of Health Care |
Educational Measurement |
Education, Graduate |
Universities |
Research Support as Topic |
Evaluation Studies as Topic |
Social Sciences |
Theory & Practice of Education |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Includes report, methodology, and data tables. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Introduction -- Context and motivation -- Study design -- The methodologies used to derive two illustrative rankings -- Some uses of the data -- The data and principal findings -- Looking ahead --Appendixes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
"A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States provides an unparalleled dataset collected from doctoral programs, doctoral faculty and public sources that can be use to assess the quality and effectiveness of doctoral programs based on measures important to faculty, students, administrators, funders, and other stakeholders. The committee collected 20 measures that include characteristicsof the faculty, such as publications, citations, grants, and diversity; and characteristics of the students, such as their GRE scores, financial support, publications, and diversity; anc characteristics of the program, such as number of Ph.D.s granted over five years, time to degree, percentage of student completion, and placement of students after graduation. The data were collected for the academic year 2005-2006 from more than 5,000 doctoral programs at 212 universities. these observations span 62 fields and the research productivity data are based typicaly on a five-year interval. Some datasets (such as publications and citations) go as far back as 1981. Information on enrollments and faculty size were also collected for 14 emerging fields ... Accompanying the report are Data tables and a detailed explanation of the methodology used to collect data and calculate ranges of rankings--Summary. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |