The journal of John Winthrop, 1630-1649 [[electronic resource] /] / edited by Richard S. Dunn and Laetitia Yeandle

• Record Nr.: UNISA996247912903316
• Autore: Winthrop John <1588-1649.>
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Cambridge, Mass., : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, c1996
• ISBN: 0-674-48427-4
• Edizione: [Abridged ed.]
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (xxii, 354 p. ) : ill.
• Collana: John Harvard library
• Altri autori (Persone): DunnRichard S; YeandleLaetitia <1930->
• Disciplina: 974/.02
• Soggetti: Massachusetts History Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775; New England History Colonial period, ca. 1600-1775
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.

The death of philosophy [[electronic resource] ] : reference and self-reference in contemporary thought / / Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel ; translated by Richard A. Lynch

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910781367303321
• Autore: Thomas-Fogiel Isabelle
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: New York, : Columbia University Press, c2011
• ISBN: 1-281-60501-8; 9786613785701; 0-231-51963-X
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (359 p.)
• Altri autori (Persone): LynchRichard A
• Disciplina: 190.9/051
• Soggetti: Philosophy, French - 21st century; Philosophy, Modern - 21st century; Reference (Philosophy)
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
• Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references.
• Nota di contenuto: pt. 1. The end of philosophy, or the paradoxes of speaking -- pt. 2. Challenging the "death of philosophy" : the reflexive a priori -- pt. 3. The end of philosophy in perspective : the source of the reflexive deficit.
• Sommario/riassunto: Philosophers debate the death of philosophy as much as they debate the death of God. Kant claimed responsibility for both philosophy's beginning and end, while Heidegger argued it concluded with Nietzsche. In the twentieth century, figures as diverse as John Austin and Richard Rorty have proclaimed philosophy's end, with some even calling for the advent of "postphilosophy." In an effort to make sense of these conflicting positions—which often say as much about the philosopher as his subject—Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel undertakes the first systematic treatment of "the end of philosophy," while also recasting the history of western thought itself.Thomas-Fogiel begins with postphilosophical claims such as scientism, which she reveals to be self-refuting, for they subsume philosophy into the branches of the natural sciences. She discovers similar issues in Rorty's skepticism and strands of continental thought. Revisiting the work of late-nineteenth ; and early-twentieth-century philosophers, when the split between analytical and continental philosophy began, Thomas-Fogiel finds both traditions followed the same path—the road of reference—which ultimately led to self-contradiction. This phenomenon, whether valorized or condemned, has been understood as the death of philosophy. Tracing this pattern from Quine to Rorty, from Heidegger to Levinas and Habermas, Thomas-Fogiel reveals the self-contradiction at the core of their claims while also carving an alternative path through self-reference. Trained under the French philosopher Bernard Bourgeois, she remakes philosophy in exciting new ways for the twenty-first century.