1.

Record Nr.

UNISA990002820080203316

Autore

BOKOTOPOULOU, Ioulias

Titolo

Epeirotika kai makedonika meletemata / Ioulias bokotopoulou = Studies on Epirus and Macedonia / Ioulias Vokotopoulou

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Athenai : He en Athenais Archaiologike Hetaireia, 2001

ISBN

960-814508-2 (set)

960-814506-6 (v. 1).

960-814507-4 (v. 2)

Descrizione fisica

2 v. (XXXIII-817 p. compless.) : ill. ; 29 cm

Collana

Bibliotheke tes en Athenais Archaiologikes Hetaireias = The archaeological society at Athens library ; 198

Disciplina

949.53

949.56

Soggetti

Epiro Studi

Macedonia Studi

Collocazione

I T EPI 2/1

I T EPI 2/2

Lingua di pubblicazione

Molteplice

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia



2.

Record Nr.

UNISA990006061170203316

Autore

BENTLEY, Delia

Titolo

30: Split intransitivity in Italian / by Delia Bentley

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Berlin ; New York : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006

ISBN

3-11-017997-2

Descrizione fisica

XIV, 455 p. ; 23 cm

Disciplina

455

Soggetti

Lingue - Italia - Sintassi

Collocazione

IV.2. 2629

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

3.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910131519203321

Autore

Oudin Martin

Titolo

Evidence in civil law : France / / Martin Oudin

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor, 2015

Slovenia : , : Institute for Local Self Government and Public Procurement Maribor, , 2015

ISBN

9789616842488

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (ii, 55 pages)

Collana

Law & Society

Soggetti

Law - Europe, except U.K

Law - Non-U.S

Law, Politics & Government

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references.



Sommario/riassunto

The French Law of evidence is at the crossroad between procedural law and civil law. As part of the procedural law, it is governed by general principles set out by the Code de procédure civile, such as the contradictory principle, the principle of public hearing or the free disposition principle, which means that the parties define the framework of the proceeding and that the judge cannot base his decision on facts that were not put forward by the parties themselves. It is also the Code de procédure civile that organises the respective roles of the judge and the parties for the taking of evidence: since 1976, it imposes a – rather complex – balance between adversarial and inquisitorial principles. Other general principles were set by case law, e.g. the principle that no one can pre-constitute evidence in his own favour or the principle of fair evidence. On the other hand, more substantive rules are to be found in the Code civil. These rules mix two systems, the system of the preuve morale, applicable in some specific litigation, and the system of the preuve légale, which is clearly dominant in civil litigation. In the first system, evidence is in principle free, which means not only that any mode of proof is admissible, but also that assessment of evidence by the judges is free. In the second one, only determined means of evidence are admissible and their probative force is often set out by law. A majority of evidence rules derive more or less directly from this summa divisio. In fact, the predominance of the preuve légale system has made the French system of evidence rather rigid, in particular regarding the exaggerated importance of written evidence.