Atti non autoritativi ed interessi legittimi : il sindacato sul comportamento della P.A. nella giurisdizione sul pubblico impiego / Lucio Iannotta

• Record Nr.: UNISA990000702250203316
• Autore: IANNOTTA, Lucio
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: Napoli : Edizioni scientifiche italiane, 1984
• Descrizione fisica: 301 p. ; 24 cm
• Disciplina: 342.45
• Soggetti: Interesse legittimo - Studi
• Collocazione: XXIV.3.L 62 (IG V 394)
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Italiano
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia

Intellectual privacy : rethinking civil liberties in the digital age / / Neil Richards

• Record Nr.: UNINA9910459811103321
• Autore: Richards Neil
• Pubbl/distr/stampa: New York, New York : , : Oxford University Press, , 2015; ©2015
• ISBN: 0-19-022509-2; 0-19-994615-9
• Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (241 p.)
• Disciplina: 342.08/58
• Soggetti: Privacy, Right of; Freedom of speech; Intellectual freedom; Electronic books.
• Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
• Formato: Materiale a stampa
• Livello bibliografico: Monografia
• Note generali: Includes index.
• Nota di contenuto: Cover; Intellectual Privacy; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction; Part I The Limits of Tort Privacy; 1 Tort Privacy; 2 Free Speech; 3 The Limits of Disclosure; 4 Invasion; 5 Data; Part II The Promise of Intellectual Privacy; 6 A Theory of Intellectual Privacy; 7 Thinking; 8 Reading; 9 Confiding; Part III Information Policy and Civil Liberties; 10 Beyond Tort Privacy; 11 Beyond Law; Conclusion; Notes; Index
• Sommario/riassunto: Most people believe that the right to privacy is inherently at odds with the right to free speech. Courts all over the world have struggled with how to reconcile the problems of media gossip with our commitment to free and open public debate for over a century. The rise of the Internet has made this problem more urgent. We live in an age of corporate and government surveillance of our lives. And our free speech culture has created an anything-goes environment on the web, where offensive and hurtful speech about others is rife. How should we think about the problems of privacy and free speech?