1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9911144730403321

Titolo

Legislatures of small states : a comparative study / / edited by Nicholas D.J. Baldwin

Pubbl/distr/stampa

London ; ; New York, N.Y. : , : Routledge, , 2013

ISBN

1-135-10298-8

1-283-97264-6

0-203-07332-0

1-135-10299-6

9780203073322

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (233 p.)

Collana

Library of legislative studies

Classificazione

POL000000

Altri autori (Persone)

BaldwinNicholas

Disciplina

328

Soggetti

Legislative bodies

States, Small

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

pt. I. Sovereign entities -- pt. II. Semi-sovereign entities -- pt. III. Sub-national entities.

Sommario/riassunto

"This book provides a comparative study of the legislatures of small nations, states and territories, to explore the extent to which size is a factor in how they function and fulfill the roles and responsibility of a legislature.Though the physical nature and environment of states is a neglected subject in political science research, this book examines the impact of small state size on the structure and functions of legislatures and contributes to a better understanding of the interplay of physical and social factors. Focussing on legislatures in democratic nations or in territories that are parts of democratic units, the book features case studies on Malta, Bermuda, Jersey, Guernsey, Gibraltar, Hong Kong, Lesotho, Liechtenstein, the Isle of Man, Commonwealth Caribbean, Nunavut (Canada), Pacific islands, Swaziland, and Scotland. Contributors employ an interdisciplinary approach to examine both the outcomes and causes of different political mechanisms, and bring to the surface underlying correlation between small states through their analysis. Legislatures of Small States will be of interest to students and



scholars of international politics, comparative politics and legislative studies"--

2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9911132017203321

Autore

Andone Corina

Titolo

Argumentation in political interviews : analyzing and evaluating responses to accusations of inconsistency / / Corina Andone

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Amsterdam, : John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2013

ISBN

9789027271754

9027271755

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

viii, 147 p. : ill

Collana

Argumentation in Context ; ; 5

Argumentation in context, , 1877-6884 ; ; v. 5

Disciplina

320.01/4

Soggetti

Communication - Political aspects

Persuasion (Rhetoric) - Political aspects

Rhetoric - Political aspects

Interviewing

Inconsistency (Logic)

Conversation analysis

Reasoning

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and indexes.

Nota di contenuto

Argumentation in Political Interviews -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Table of contents -- Preface -- 1. Introduction -- 1.1 Responding to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview -- 1.2 A pragma-dialectical perspective on argumentation -- 1.3 Objectives and method of the study -- 1.4 Organization of the study -- 2. Analytically relevant responses to an accusation of inconsistency -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Communicative and interactional purposes of an accusation of inconsistency -- 2.3 Responses to an accusation of inconsistency -- 2.4 Conclusion -- 3. The political interview as an argumentative activity type -- 3.1 The institutional goal of political interviews -- 3.2 The initial situation -- 3.3 Starting points -- 3.4



Argumentative means -- 3.5 The possible outcome -- 3.6 Conclusion -- 4. Strategic maneuvering in response to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview -- 4.1 Accusations of inconsistency in a political interview -- 4.2 Retracting a standpoint in response to an accusation of inconsistency -- 4.3 Exploiting commitments to win the discussion -- Pattern 1: 'it depends' -- Pattern 2: 'we need to be clear' -- Pattern 3: 'there is a world of difference' -- 4.4 Conclusion -- 5. The reasonableness of responses to an accusation of inconsistency in a political interview -- 5.1 The reasonableness of confrontational strategic maneuvering -- 5.2 Soundness conditions -- 5.2.1 Soundness condition of openness -- 5.2.2 Soundness condition of relevance -- 5.2.3 Soundness condition of clarity -- 5.3 Conclusion -- 6. Conclusion -- 6.1 Main findings -- 6.2 Implications for further research -- References -- List of figures -- Name index -- Subject index.

Sommario/riassunto

In Argumentation in Political Interviews Corina Andone uses the pragma-dialectical concept of strategic maneuvering to gain a better understanding of political interviews as argumentative practices. She analyzes and evaluates the way in which politicians react in political interviews to the accusation that the position they currently hold is inconsistent with a position they advanced before. The politicians' responses to such charges are examined for their strategic function by concentrating on a number of concrete cases and explaining how the arguers try to enhance their chances of winning the discussion. In addition, the soundness criteria are formulated for judging properly when the politicians' responses are indeed reasonable.This book is important to argumentation theorists, discourse analysts, communication scholars and all other researchers and students interested in the way in which language is used for the purpose of persuasion in a political context.Corina Andone is Assistant Professor of Speech Communication, Argumentation Theory and Rhetoric at the Faculty of Humanities of the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands.