| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9911022161003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Park Seungbae |
|
|
Titolo |
Induction, Science, and Morality / / by Seungbae Park |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Cham : , : Springer Nature Switzerland : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed. 2025.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (247 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, , 2542-8292 ; ; 520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Science - Philosophy |
Religion - Philosophy |
Metaethics |
Philosophy of Science |
Philosophy of Religion |
Meta-Ethics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1 Critiques of Hume’s Argument against Inductions -- 2 Can Coherentism Solve the Problem of Inductions? -- 3 Can the Local Theory of Induction Solve the problem of Induction? -- 4 The Excessive Requirements on the Use of IBE -- 5 The Template for Generating Philosophical Problems -- 6 Inductive Skepticism and the Scientific Realism Debate -- 7 The Pessimistic Inductions vs. the Counter-Inductions -- 8 Stage Theory of Scientific Development -- 9 The Evolutionary Debunking Argument against Scientific Realism -- 10 Merging the Moral Realism Debate with Scientific Realism Debate -- 11 In Defense of Moral Functionalism 12 Does Mathematical Realism Help Moral Realism? -- 13 Metaethical and Non-Metaethical Explanations of Moral Progress -- 14 The Implications of Metaethical Theories for Scientific and Moral Progress -- 15 The Evolutionary Debunking Argument for Moral Skepticism -- 16 The Problem of Moral Induction -- Index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
This book offers new insights into Hume’s problem of induction. In addition to that, it argues against the coherentist justification of induction, refuting Hume's initial problem of induction and develops |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
counter-inductions to defend scientific realism from pessimists and advocates a realist theory of scientific development. In doing so, this book enriches the moral realism debate with the scientific realism debate and is of great value to researchers and advanced students in philosophy of science. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |