| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9911002542303321 |
|
|
Autore |
Quené Saskia |
|
|
Titolo |
Between Figure and Ground : Seeing in Premodernity |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Berlin : , : Deutscher Kunstverlag GmbH, , 2025 |
|
©2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (653 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Table of Contents -- Sharing Ground: An Introduction in Conversation with David Young Kim -- Selected Bibliography -- Acknowledgements -- Part 1 Staging Figures -- In the Round: Master WA’s Figureless Prints and Fifteenth-Century Painted Grounds -- Tableau-vivant Curtains as Mediators between Figure and Ground: Petrus Christus, the Salzburg Master, and Jean Fouquet -- Miracles of Mediation: Staging the Sacred in the Annunciation by Pedro da Córdoba -- Part 2 Describing and Translating -- Iconic Difference -- Campus as Locus and Narrative Stained Glass -- Lineage of a Paradigm: “Figure and Ground” in Encyclopedic Sources -- Part 3 Beyond the Surface -- A Foray of Stained Glass: Color, Grisaille, Transparency -- Between Figure and Ground: Lorenzetti’s Gold -- Leonardos Untergrund: Zur Gedächtniskunst des Pausens -- Part 4 Navigating Dichotomies -- Zwischen Gestaltpsychologie und Kunstwissenschaft: Zur Ideen- und Begriffsgeschichte von ,Figur und Grund‘ -- Zwei Meta-Physiken des Bildes? Zur Figur/Grund-Relation in der Vormoderne aus der Perspektive dreistelliger Bildbegriffe -- What Guides the Beholder’s Eye: Figures, Ground, or Perspective? -- Part 5 Transgressing Depth -- Painting Shadows in the Middle Ages -- Smoke and Mirrors? The (In)visible Worlds of David Bailly -- Embedded Space in Early Renaissance Painting -- Zeit als Figur ohne Grund -- Image Credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The terms "figure" and "ground" became fundamental to art-historical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
analysis and writing over the course of the twentieth century. But is this dichotomy suited to describe premodern art and artifacts? In Between Figure and Ground: Seeing in Premodernity, essays by Claudia Blümle, Gottfried Boehm, Péter Bokody, Beate Fricke, Bruno Haas, David Young Kim, Aden Kumler, Christopher Lakey, Karin Leonhard, Jürgen Müller, Veronica Peselmann, Christoph Poetsch, Raphael Rosenberg, Tom Steinert, Nicola Suthor, Noa Turel, and Saskia Quené call into question long-standing habits of seeing and understanding figure-ground relations, expand art-historical vocabularies, and productively challenge anachronistic attachments to modernist paradigms. Offering new approaches and methodological reflections from art history and theory, Bildwissenschaft, and art historiography, this volume provides stimulating answers to the question: What can be seen and described between premodern figures and grounds? Look inside Figure and ground in the context of art-historical analysis Transcends binary structures seeing and understanding figure-ground relations |
„Figur“ und „Grund“ sind zentrale Begriffe der Kunstwissenschaft. Sie entstammen jedoch einer Kunstgeschichte der Moderne. Inwiefern diese dichotomen Leitbegriffe des Sehens auch geeignete Leitbegriffe einer Kunstgeschichte der Vormoderne sein können, ist jedoch weitgehend unhinterfragt geblieben. Dieser Band stellt mit Beiträgen von Claudia Blümle, Gottfried Boehm, Péter Bokody, Beate Fricke, Bruno Haas, David Young Kim, Aden Kumler, Christopher Lakey, Karin Leonhard, Jürgen Müller, Veronica Peselmann, Christoph Poetsch, Raphael Rosenberg, Tom Steinert, Nicola Suthor, Noa Turel und Saskia Quené etablierte Sehgewohnheiten in Frage und fordert anachronistische Bindungen an modernistische Paradigmen heraus. Bildtheoretische, kunsthistorische, historiographische und methodologische Ansätze stehen dabei gleichermaßen zur Debatte. Was lässt sich zwischen Figur und Grund sehen und beschreiben? Blick ins Buch Figur und Grund im Kontext der kunsthistorischen Analyse zentrale Aspekte der Diskussion neue Forschungsfragen |
|
|
|
|
|
| |