1.

Record Nr.

UNICAMPANIASUN0082958

Autore

Claro, Giulio <1525-1575>

Titolo

Iulii Clari alexandrini ... Opera omnia; siue Practica ciuilis, atque criminalis; cum doctissimis additionibus perillustrium iurisconsultorum d. Ioannis Baptistae Baiardi ... d. Bernardini Rossignoli ... d. Hieronymi Giacharii ... d. Ioannis Guiotii ... d. Antonii Droghi ... Hisque nouissime accesserunt notae, & animaduersiones doctorum inter Germanos sublimium d. Ioannis Harprecti, & d. Manfredi Goueani ... Apposita etiam sunt quaestionum, & additionum summaria, necnon duplex rerum memorabilium index: quorum alter Practicae Ciuili; alter Criminali inseruit. ...  [1]

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Segnatura : π² *² (-*2) a⁸ b⁴ A-2G⁶

Edizione

[[28], 360 p]

Descrizione fisica

Errori nella segnatura

Lingua di pubblicazione

Latino

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia



2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910988284403321

Autore

Freeman James B

Titolo

Adequate Connections : Assessing Argument Ground Adequacy / / by James B. Freeman

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Cham : , : Springer Nature Switzerland : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2025

ISBN

9783031764776

3031764773

Edizione

[1st ed. 2025.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (XIII, 179 p. 12 illus.)

Collana

Argumentation Library, , 2215-1907 ; ; 38

Disciplina

160

Soggetti

Logic

Philosophical Logic

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Nota di contenuto

Connection Adequacy and the Concept of Warrant -- Identifying the Warrant of an Argument -- What Types of Warrants Are There? -- Conclusive A Priori Warrants -- Defeasible Warrants and Probability -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants I: Empirical Warrants -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants II: Personal Warrants -- Defeasible A Posteriori Warrants III: Institutional Warrants -- Defeasible A Priori Warrants -- Virtually Conclusive A Posteriori Warrants -- Determining Whether a Particular Connection is Adequate.

Sommario/riassunto

This book presents a comprehensive picture of when the premises of an argument are adequately connected to its conclusion. The author draws upon the familiar Toulmin model, Rescher’s discussion of presumption and burden of proof, and L. Jonathan Cohen’s presentation of the method of relevant variables. The book first assesses the warrant or inference rule connecting the premises to the conclusion. To analyzes this, the author asks a series of questions such as - should the warrant be evaluated by conclusive or defeasible standards? Does the argument require that its premises, if acceptable, guarantee that the conclusion is acceptable also or does it allow the premises just to present a body of relevant evidence? Is the inference rule backed or supported a priori or a posteriori? These distinctions form four categories of warrants: conclusive a priori, defeasible a



posteriori, defeasible a priori, and virtually conclusive a posteriori. The warrants in each category are evaluated differently for how strongly the premises support the conclusion of arguments instancing those warrants. After presenting the rationale for this division and discussing our nonprobabilistic approach, the author analyzes the connection adequacy for each of these types of warrants. This book is of interest to scholars of argumentation theory.