| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910554598703321 |
|
|
Autore |
Guillot Armand |
|
|
Titolo |
Jeremy Bentham : le peuple comme fiction / / Armand Guillot |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Paris, : Éditions de la Sorbonne, 2021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (396 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Philosophy |
philosophie |
interprétation |
utilitarisme |
critique |
Bentham |
théorie de la fiction |
peuple |
contrat social |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Jeremy Bentham entend dépasser les théories du contrat social et développer une philosophie politique fondée exclusivement sur le principe d’utilité. Il considère en effet que le contrat social est une fiction et que « la saison de la fiction est désormais terminée ». Pourtant, le détour par la fiction est nécessaire pour introduire l’unité dans la multitude et instituer un peuple. Bentham affirme que les individus qui composent la multitude atteignent leur plus grande unité lorsqu’ils s’assemblent en un « tribunal de l’opinion publique ». Et, même si ses effets sont réels, ce tribunal est bel et bien une « entité fictive ». L’attitude de Bentham à l’égard des fictions est donc ambiguë. Elle nécessite de les définir rigoureusement et de déterminer leurs conditions de recevabilité. De ce point de vue, l’utilitarisme benthamien se réalise comme théorie des fictions. Il s’agit d’opposer au contrat social des fictions fondées sur le réel et qui permettent de l’ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
organiser, en vue de promouvoir la fin fixée par le principe d’utilité : le plus grand bonheur du plus grand nombre. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910978070203321 |
|
|
Autore |
Pleiger Henriette |
|
|
Titolo |
Interdisciplinary Exhibitions and the Production of Knowledge : Perspectives from Curatorial Practice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Bielefeld : , : transcript Verlag, , 2025 |
|
©2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (245 pages) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Frontmatter -- Contents -- List of Figures -- Acknowledgements -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Mapping out the scope of this research: A literature review -- 3 Theories of interdisciplinarity and their methodological application to museum practice -- 4 A transdisciplinary and participatory exhibition: Setting the bar for good practice – TOUCHDOWN. An exhibition with and about people with Down’s syndrome -- 5 The ‘inter-disciplined’ exhibition: Art meets science – Weather Report. About Weather Culture and Climate Science -- 6 A multidisciplinary exhibition and the political dimension of interdisciplinarity – We Capitalists. From Zero to Turbo -- 7 Conclusion -- Bibliography -- Appendix: Interview questions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
How can exhibitions not only stage existing knowledge, but also raise questions that might eventually lead to new research? This question has become ever more relevant due to the museum sector's growing interest in the development of thematic exhibitions that combine narratives and objects from art, science, cultural history, and everyday life. Using theories from interdisciplinarity studies, Henriette Pleiger identifies different ways of producing knowledge during the exhibition- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
making process, as well as the mechanisms that are necessary for an exhibition to be considered interdisciplinary. The development of such exhibitions can be understood as collaborative research processes. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |