1.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910162989503321

Titolo

Der deutsche "Lucidarius". . Band I, Kritischer Text nach den Handschriften / / Georg Steer, Dagmar Gottschall

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Tübingen : , : Max Niemeyer Verlag, , [2015]

©1994

ISBN

3-11-094730-7

Edizione

[Reprint 2015]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (492 pages)

Collana

Texte und Textgeschichte ; ; 35

Disciplina

808.80382

Soggetti

Christian literature

Lingua di pubblicazione

Tedesco

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di contenuto

Frontmatter -- Inhaltsverzeichnis -- Vorwort -- KRITISCHER TEXT -- Prolog -- Buch I -- Buch II -- Buch III -- WÖRTERBUCH -- 1 . Konzept des Wörterbuchs zum >Lucidarius< -- 2. Textgrundlage und Umfang des mittelhochdeutschen Wortmaterials -- 3. Die Lemmatisierung -- 4. Aufbau der Artikel -- 5. Bedeutungsangabe -- 6. Quellennachweis -- 7. Behandlung des lateinischen Wortschatzes -- 8. Verzeichnis der lateinischen Zitate -- 9. Behandlung der Eigennamen -- 10. Verweissystem -- Verzeichnis der für das Wörterbuch verwendeten Quellen und Literatur -- ABKÜRZUNGSVERZEICHNIS -- DEUTSCHE WÖRTER -- LATEINISCHE WÖRTER



2.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910788909303321

Autore

Mayer Thomas F (Thomas Frederick), <1951-2014, >

Titolo

The Roman Inquisition on the Stage of Italy, c. 1590-1640 / / Thomas F. Mayer

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Philadelphia : , : University of Pennsylvania Press, , [2013]

©2014

ISBN

0-8122-0934-6

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource (368 p.)

Collana

Haney Foundation Series

Disciplina

272/.209032

Soggetti

Trials (Heresy) - Italy - History - 17th century

Trials (Heresy) - Italy - History - 16th century

Inquisition - Italy - History - 17th century

Inquisition - Italy - History - 16th century

Italy Church history 17th century

Italy Church history 16th century

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Nota di contenuto

Front matter -- Contents -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Spain and Naples -- Chapter 2. Naples: Tommaso Campanella -- Chapter 3. Venice in the Wake of the Interdict -- Chapter 4. Venice: Giordano Bruno, Cesare Cremonini, and Marcantonio De Dominis -- Chapter 5. Florence I -- Chapter 6. Florence II -- Conclusion -- Notes -- List of Abbreviations -- Selected Bibliography -- Index -- Acknowledgments

Sommario/riassunto

From the moment of its founding in 1542, the Roman Inquisition acted as a political machine. Although inquisitors in earlier centuries had operated somewhat independently of papal authority, the gradual bureaucratization of the Roman Inquisition permitted the popes increasing license to establish and exercise direct control over local tribunals, though with varying degrees of success. In particular, Pope Urban VIII's aggressive drive to establish papal control through the agency of the Inquisition played out differently among the Italian states, whose local inquisitions varied in number and secular power. Rome's efforts to bring the Venetians to heel largely failed in spite of the interdict of 1606, and Venice maintained lay control of most



religious matters. Although Florence and Naples resisted papal intrusions into their jurisdictions, on the other hand, they were eventually brought to answer directly to Rome—due in no small part to Urban VIII's subversions of the law. Thomas F. Mayer provides a richly detailed account of the ways the Roman Inquisition operated to serve the papacy's long-standing political aims in Naples, Venice, and Florence. Drawing on the Inquisition's own records, diplomatic correspondence, local documents, newsletters, and other sources, Mayer sheds new light on papal interdicts and high-profile court cases that signaled significant shifts in inquisitorial authority for each Italian state. Alongside his earlier volume, The Roman Inquisition: A Papal Bureaucracy and Its Laws in the Age of Galileo, this masterful study extends and develops our understanding of the Inquisition as a political and legal institution.

3.

Record Nr.

UNINA9910973818403321

Autore

Walton Douglas N

Titolo

Informal fallacies : towards a theory of argument criticisms / / Douglas N. Walton

Pubbl/distr/stampa

Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : J. Benjamins Pub. Co., 1987

ISBN

1-283-35890-5

9786613358905

90-272-7890-3

Edizione

[1st ed.]

Descrizione fisica

1 online resource  (x, 336 pages)

Collana

Pragmatics & beyond companion series ; ; 4

Classificazione

CC 2600

Disciplina

165

Soggetti

Fallacies (Logic)

Logic

Lingua di pubblicazione

Inglese

Formato

Materiale a stampa

Livello bibliografico

Monografia

Note generali

Description based upon print version of record.

Nota di bibliografia

Includes bibliography and indexes.

Nota di contenuto

INFORMAL FALLACIES Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Acknowledgements; Table of contents; CHAPTER 1: A NEW MODEL OF ARGUMENT; 1. Introduction to the Fallacies; 2. Some More Fallacies; 3. Fallacies Combined in Realistic Dialogues; 4. What is an Argument?; 5. Criticism as Challenge and



Response; 6. Basic Categories of Argument Study; NOTES; CHAPTER TWO: HOT RHETORIC AND ARGUMENT; 1. Appeals to Popular Sentiment; 2. Appeals to Force; 3. Appeals to Pity; 4. Overly Personal Argumentation; 5. The Rhetorical Debate

6. Case Study: Parliamentary Debate 1. THE ECONOMY MEASURES TO MAINTAIN EMPLOYMENT; 2. BANKS AND BANKING; 7. Conclusion; NOTES; CHAPTER 3: THE LOGIC OF PROPOSITIONS; 1. Deductive Validity; 2. Formal Logic; 3. Classical Propositional Calculus; 4. Applying Deductive Logic to Arguments; 5. Invalidity and Fallaciousness; 6. Relevance and Validit; 7. Subject-Matter Relatedness; 8. Relatedness Logic; 9. Semantics and Pragmatics; 10. What is a Fallacy?; NOTES; CHAPTER 4: LOGICAL DIALOGUE-GAMES; 1. Different Approaches to Formal Dialogues; 2. The Ad Ignorantiam Fallacy; 3. Fallacies of Question-Asking

4. The Fallacy of Many Questions 5. Demanding Direct Answers to Questions; 6. Misconception of Refutation; 7. Case Studies of Political Debates; 8. A Game with Dark-Side Commitments; NOTES; CHAPTER 5: ENTHYMEMES; 1. The Tradition of Enthymemes; 2. The Objectives of Dialogue; 3. Veiled Commitment-Sets; 4. Strategy and Plausibility; 5. The Problem Resolved; 6. Order of the Premisses; 7. Multiple Premisses in Complex Arguments; NOTE; CHAPTER 6: LONGER SEQUENCES OF ARGUMENTATION; 1. Sequences of Argumentation; 2. Graphs of Arguments; 3. Case Study: Argument on Sex Education

4. Case Study: Circular Argumentation 5. Plausibility Conditions on Arguments; 6. The Missing Links; 7. Conclusions on Circular Arguments; NOTES; CHAPTER 7: FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS FROM AUTHORITY; 1. How Appeals to Authority Can Go Wrong; 2. Plausible Argument; 3. Where Experts Disagree; 4. Expertise and Legal Dialogue; 5. Dialogue and Expertise; 6. Conclusions; NOTE; CHAPTER 8: VARIOUS FALLACIES; 1. Inductive Fallacies; 2. Deductive and Inductive Arguments; 3. Post Hoc Arguments; 4. Slippery Slope; 5. Equivocation; 6. Amphiboly; 7. Composition and Division

CHAPTER 9: ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE PERSON 1. Poisoning the Well; 2. The Sportsman's Rejoinder; 3. Evaluating Ad Hominem Disputations; 4. Four Types of Circumstantial Ad Hominem; 5. Rhetorical Context of Ad Hominem Attacks; 6. Positional Defensibility; 7. Conclusion; NOTES; CHAPTER 10: EQUIVOCATION; 1. What is Equivocation?; 2. Vagueness and Criticisms of Equivocality; 3. The Problem of Subtle Equivocations; 4. Deep Deception and Equivocal Dialogue; 5. Many-Valued Logic for Equivocators; 6. Priest's System LP; 7. Applying LP to the Fallacy of Equivocation; 8. R-Mingle as a Logic for Equivocators; 9. RM and Equivocation

Sommario/riassunto

The basic question of this monograph is: how should we go about judging arguments to be reasonable or unreasonable? Our concern will be with argument in a broad sense, with realistic arguments in natural language. The basic object will be to engage in a normative study of determining what factors, standards, or procedures should be adopted or appealed to in evaluating an argument as "good," "not-so-good," "open to criticism," "fallacious," and so forth. Hence our primary concern will be with the problems of how to criticize an argument, and when a criticism is reasonably justified.