| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNICASRML0292480 |
|
|
Titolo |
2.social and historical sciences, philosophy and religion edited by Alan Day, Joan M. Harvey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
London, : The library association, 1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[Fifth ed. vol.2] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910972849003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Peay Jill |
|
|
Titolo |
Decisions and dilemmas : working with mental health law / Jill Peay |
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Oxford ; Portland, Oregon, : Hart Publishing, 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9786610808410 |
9781472559432 |
1472559436 |
9781280808418 |
1280808411 |
9781847311009 |
1847311008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (238 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Mental health laws - Great Britain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages [205]-214) and index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
1. Robert Draper: A Case for Admission? -- 2. Clive Wright: A Case for Discharge? -- 3. Hazel Robinson: A Case for Compulsory Treatment? -- 4. Decision-making Research: Context and Content -- 5. Legal and Policy Context -- 6. Conclusions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
In the field of mental health law,we entrust decisions with consequences of the utmost gravity - decisions about compulsory medical treatment and the loss of liberty - to doctors and approved social workers. Yet, how do these non-lawyers make decisions where the legitimacy of those decisions derives from law? This book examines the practical, ethical and legal terrain of duo-disciplinary decision-making: given identical cases, what dilemmas do psychiatrists and approved social workers encounter, do they reach the same or similar decisions and, most critically, how are those decisions justified? At a time of ferment in mental health law this book, through its narrative format, aids a better understanding of the dilemmas posed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |