|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910972689003321 |
|
|
Autore |
Bowles Melissa A. |
|
|
Titolo |
The think-aloud controversy in second language research / / Melissa A. Bowles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
New York, N.Y., : Routledge, 2010 |
|
New York : , : Routledge, , 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
1-135-14942-9 |
1-135-14943-7 |
1-282-58985-7 |
9786612589850 |
0-203-85633-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (185 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collana |
|
Second language acquisition research series: theoretical and methodological issues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Second language acquisition - Research |
Language and languages - Research |
Thought and thinking - Study and teaching |
English language - Study and teaching - Foreign speakers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references (p. [151]-165) and index. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Book Cover; Title; Copyright; Contents; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1 The Use of Verbal Reports in Language Research; 2 Controversy Over the Use of Think-Alouds: Reactivity; 3 Features that Make a Task Amenable to Think-Aloud: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Investigating the Validity of Think-Alouds on Verbal Tasks; 4 Data Collection Considerations; 5 Data Analysis Considerations; 6 Conclusion; Appendix A: Studies Included in the Meta-Analysis; Appendix B: Summary of Unique Sample Studies; Notes; References; Index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
The Think-Aloud Controversy in Second Language Research aims to answer key questions about the validity and uses of think-alouds, verbal reports completed by research participants while they perform a task. It offers an overview of how think-alouds have been used in language research and presents a quantitative meta-analysis of |
|
|
|
|