|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Record Nr. |
UNINA9910972252503321 |
|
|
Titolo |
Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews / / Institute of Medicine of the National Academies ; Jill Eden ... [et al.], editors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pubbl/distr/stampa |
|
|
Washington, D.C., : National Academies Press, c2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ISBN |
|
9786613151759 |
9780309216715 |
0309216710 |
9781283151757 |
1283151758 |
9780309164269 |
0309164265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edizione |
[1st ed.] |
|
|
|
|
|
Descrizione fisica |
|
1 online resource (341 p.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Altri autori (Persone) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disciplina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soggetti |
|
Medical care - Standards - United States |
Medical care - United States - Quality control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lingua di pubblicazione |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formato |
Materiale a stampa |
|
|
|
|
|
Livello bibliografico |
Monografia |
|
|
|
|
|
Note generali |
|
Description based upon print version of record. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di bibliografia |
|
Includes bibliographical references. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nota di contenuto |
|
Standards for initiating a systematic review -- Standards for finding and assessing individual studies -- Standards for synthesizing the body of evidence -- Standards for reporting systematic reviews -- Improving the quality of systematic reviews. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sommario/riassunto |
|
Healthcare decision makers in search of reliable information that compares health interventions increasingly turn to systematic reviews for the best summary of the evidence. Systematic reviews identify, select, assess, and synthesize the findings of similar but separate studies, and can help clarify what is known and not known about the potential benefits and harms of drugs, devices, and other healthcare services. Systematic reviews can be helpful for clinicians who want to integrate research findings into their daily practices, for patients to make well-informed choices about their own care, for professional medical societies and other organizations that develop clinical practice guidelines. Too often systematic reviews are of uncertain or poor |
|
|
|
|